![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 539709 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200203 |
| Day | Mon |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Altitude | agl single value : 500 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : zzz.tower |
| Operator | general aviation : personal |
| Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Plan | None |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Flight Phase | cruise : level |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | other |
| Function | flight crew : single pilot |
| Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : private |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 92 flight time total : 1028 flight time type : 632 |
| ASRS Report | 539709 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | government : faa |
| Function | controller : local |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | airspace violation : entry non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far other anomaly other |
| Independent Detector | other controllera |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
| Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Airspace Structure FAA Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Flying VFR 500 ft AGL. Followed the current washington sectional using a new garmin 295M a trimble tnl 2000A, an argus 5000 moving map. I flew through the VFR corridor under the class B all of which show VFR surface to 3000. I continued to ZZZ when I contracted tower to transition through their airspace, I was advised to contact approach. When I landed at ZZZ1 airport to call them, they were already on the phone. I have since been contacted and questioned (in person) by the secret service and FAA. I did not realize I violated a temporary flight restr. I knew there were tfr's after 9/tue/01. However, the last time I talked to FSS, I was under the assumption they were all lifted except over large gatherings (3000 people) such as sport events. I was not aware of NASA's ASRS. I am attending FAA safety seminars. Suggestion: the new washington sectional which just came out still shows the same VFR corridor where I went through. Is 5 months temporary? If this has not been lifted since september, then the people who print the sectionals should put a big red circle with white dots around this (indefinite?) flight restr so a pilot can say 'hey, I better check this!'
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A SMA PLT VIOLATED A TFR INVOLVING ENHANCED CLASS B AIRSPACE.
Narrative: FLYING VFR 500 FT AGL. FOLLOWED THE CURRENT WASHINGTON SECTIONAL USING A NEW GARMIN 295M A TRIMBLE TNL 2000A, AN ARGUS 5000 MOVING MAP. I FLEW THROUGH THE VFR CORRIDOR UNDER THE CLASS B ALL OF WHICH SHOW VFR SURFACE TO 3000. I CONTINUED TO ZZZ WHEN I CONTRACTED TOWER TO TRANSITION THROUGH THEIR AIRSPACE, I WAS ADVISED TO CONTACT APCH. WHEN I LANDED AT ZZZ1 ARPT TO CALL THEM, THEY WERE ALREADY ON THE PHONE. I HAVE SINCE BEEN CONTACTED AND QUESTIONED (IN PERSON) BY THE SECRET SERVICE AND FAA. I DID NOT REALIZE I VIOLATED A TEMPORARY FLT RESTR. I KNEW THERE WERE TFR'S AFTER 9/TUE/01. HOWEVER, THE LAST TIME I TALKED TO FSS, I WAS UNDER THE ASSUMPTION THEY WERE ALL LIFTED EXCEPT OVER LARGE GATHERINGS (3000 PEOPLE) SUCH AS SPORT EVENTS. I WAS NOT AWARE OF NASA'S ASRS. I AM ATTENDING FAA SAFETY SEMINARS. SUGGESTION: THE NEW WASHINGTON SECTIONAL WHICH JUST CAME OUT STILL SHOWS THE SAME VFR CORRIDOR WHERE I WENT THROUGH. IS 5 MONTHS TEMPORARY? IF THIS HAS NOT BEEN LIFTED SINCE SEPTEMBER, THEN THE PEOPLE WHO PRINT THE SECTIONALS SHOULD PUT A BIG RED CIRCLE WITH WHITE DOTS AROUND THIS (INDEFINITE?) FLT RESTR SO A PLT CAN SAY 'HEY, I BETTER CHK THIS!'
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.