An air carrier crew, after landing at ito, taxied on closed portion of runway.

Attributes
ACN	526508
Time
Date	200110
Day	Thu
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : ito.airport
State Reference	HI
Altitude	agl single value : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	Mixed
Weather Elements	Rain
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tower : iah.tower
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	Commercial Fixed Wing
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Navigation In Use	ils localizer only : 26
Flight Phase	descent : approach ground : taxi landing : roll
Route In Use	approach : instrument non precision approach : visual
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 130 flight time total : 10000 flight time type : 7000
ASRS Report	526508
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Events
Anomaly	excursion : runway inflight encounter : weather non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other controllera
Resolutory Action	controller : issued advisory none taken : detected after the fact
Consequence	faa : reviewed incident with flight crew
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Weather Flight Crew Human Performance Airport ATC Human Performance
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance

Narrative:

Runway 8/26 at ito airport was noted to have 3000 ft of closure on the west end due to construction. We were vectored for an ILS runway 26 approach due to decaying WX conditions: light rain, 800-1000 ft ceiling with a slight tailwind. Upon landing, the crew noticed barricades across (cones) the runway ahead, and elected to roll out to the last taxiway before the coned off section of the runway. While slowing to the taxiway, tower radioed to us that we have entered the closed section of the runway and to do a 180 degree turn and exit the runway via the taxiway that we just passed. While turning around on the runway, we then noticed some other barricades and cones that were placed along the sides of the runway to identify the closed section. We did not notice these identifiers (cones) on landing rollout due partly to rain and low visibility and mostly due to the fact that we had both seen the cones and barricades across the runway further down the runway and believed that idented the closed section. I asked tower if there was a problem with this incident and he stated 'no.'

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN ACR CREW, AFTER LNDG AT ITO, TAXIED ON CLOSED PORTION OF RWY.

Narrative: RWY 8/26 AT ITO ARPT WAS NOTED TO HAVE 3000 FT OF CLOSURE ON THE W END DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. WE WERE VECTORED FOR AN ILS RWY 26 APCH DUE TO DECAYING WX CONDITIONS: LIGHT RAIN, 800-1000 FT CEILING WITH A SLIGHT TAILWIND. UPON LNDG, THE CREW NOTICED BARRICADES ACROSS (CONES) THE RWY AHEAD, AND ELECTED TO ROLL OUT TO THE LAST TXWY BEFORE THE CONED OFF SECTION OF THE RWY. WHILE SLOWING TO THE TXWY, TWR RADIOED TO US THAT WE HAVE ENTERED THE CLOSED SECTION OF THE RWY AND TO DO A 180 DEG TURN AND EXIT THE RWY VIA THE TXWY THAT WE JUST PASSED. WHILE TURNING AROUND ON THE RWY, WE THEN NOTICED SOME OTHER BARRICADES AND CONES THAT WERE PLACED ALONG THE SIDES OF THE RWY TO IDENT THE CLOSED SECTION. WE DID NOT NOTICE THESE IDENTIFIERS (CONES) ON LNDG ROLLOUT DUE PARTLY TO RAIN AND LOW VISIBILITY AND MOSTLY DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE HAD BOTH SEEN THE CONES AND BARRICADES ACROSS THE RWY FURTHER DOWN THE RWY AND BELIEVED THAT IDENTED THE CLOSED SECTION. I ASKED TWR IF THERE WAS A PROB WITH THIS INCIDENT AND HE STATED 'NO.'

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.