Narrative:

Departed sfo on the quiet 1 departure. Clearance was to fly direct to ccr after rebas intersection. Flight crew misread rebas intersection as 11 DME from sfo VOR, therefore turned early toward ccr. Controller asked if we were turning and directed us back on course. Cause of the deviation due to pilots believing rebas was 11 DME from sfo. The incident may be prevented in the future if the chart (sfo 10-30) was more clear in defining rebas, ie, listed a DME from sfo VOR instead of just the distance between an intersection and rebas. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following: reporter states crew reviewed SID before departure and felt they understood it well. Very disturbed to find interpretation of SID not accurate.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: HEADING DEVIATION. CHART CONFUSION.

Narrative: DEPARTED SFO ON THE QUIET 1 DEP. CLRNC WAS TO FLY DIRECT TO CCR AFTER REBAS INTXN. FLT CREW MISREAD REBAS INTXN AS 11 DME FROM SFO VOR, THEREFORE TURNED EARLY TOWARD CCR. CTLR ASKED IF WE WERE TURNING AND DIRECTED US BACK ON COURSE. CAUSE OF THE DEVIATION DUE TO PLTS BELIEVING REBAS WAS 11 DME FROM SFO. THE INCIDENT MAY BE PREVENTED IN THE FUTURE IF THE CHART (SFO 10-30) WAS MORE CLEAR IN DEFINING REBAS, IE, LISTED A DME FROM SFO VOR INSTEAD OF JUST THE DISTANCE BTWN AN INTERSECTION AND REBAS. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: RPTR STATES CREW REVIEWED SID BEFORE DEP AND FELT THEY UNDERSTOOD IT WELL. VERY DISTURBED TO FIND INTERP OF SID NOT ACCURATE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.