![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 657884 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200505 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : dfw.tower |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | B737-400 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | ground : maintenance ground : takeoff roll |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | maintenance : technician |
| ASRS Report | 657884 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | other personnel other |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : non compliance with mel non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
| Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : center tank fuel qty ind other flight crewa other flight crewb |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
| Consequence | other other |
| Factors | |
| Maintenance | contributing factor : manuals contributing factor : schedule pressure performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements performance deficiency : logbook entry |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Aircraft Chart Or Publication |
| Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
Maintenance control would not give an MEL for the discrepancy. They said this was a soft failure. Verified in the maintenance manual that this was a hard failure. Advised maintenance control of findings and that the center tank would have to be de-fueled so that quantity could be verified. This discrepancy occurred after the center tank was fueled. Management notified; and requested a de-fuel truck. We were advised that it would be 1 hour before they could respond. At that point; I was told to request that the flight crew start engines at the gate to burn off fuel that was remaining in the tank. This was accomplished. I was focused on getting the aircraft de-fueled as soon as possible. Also; passenger were on board throughout this process. During the deferral process; I missed disconnecting the fuel summation unit.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B737-400 WAS DISPATCHED WITH THE CTR TANK FUEL QUANTITY INDICATION INOP PER THE MEL. SPECIAL PROC TO DISCONNECT FUEL SUMMATION UNIT NOT ACCOMPLISHED.
Narrative: MAINT CTL WOULD NOT GIVE AN MEL FOR THE DISCREPANCY. THEY SAID THIS WAS A SOFT FAILURE. VERIFIED IN THE MAINT MANUAL THAT THIS WAS A HARD FAILURE. ADVISED MAINT CTL OF FINDINGS AND THAT THE CTR TANK WOULD HAVE TO BE DE-FUELED SO THAT QUANTITY COULD BE VERIFIED. THIS DISCREPANCY OCCURRED AFTER THE CTR TANK WAS FUELED. MGMNT NOTIFIED; AND REQUESTED A DE-FUEL TRUCK. WE WERE ADVISED THAT IT WOULD BE 1 HR BEFORE THEY COULD RESPOND. AT THAT POINT; I WAS TOLD TO REQUEST THAT THE FLT CREW START ENGS AT THE GATE TO BURN OFF FUEL THAT WAS REMAINING IN THE TANK. THIS WAS ACCOMPLISHED. I WAS FOCUSED ON GETTING THE ACFT DE-FUELED ASAP. ALSO; PAX WERE ON BOARD THROUGHOUT THIS PROCESS. DURING THE DEFERRAL PROCESS; I MISSED DISCONNECTING THE FUEL SUMMATION UNIT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.