Narrative:

On the night of apr/tue/04 at approximately XA45, I received a call from ZZZ1 line maintenance asking if we could MEL the r-hand pack on aircraft. I placed the mechanic on hold and called dispatch. Dispatcher said it was ok. I hung up with the dispatcher and picked back up the line with the mechanic. I told the mechanic it was ok. I then asked the mechanic what we had. He explained the right pack caused a wing to body overheat. I asked, 'a wing to body overheat or pack overheat?' he seemed unsure and said there were no leaks. I don't remember the exact words, but after going back and forth a little, I finally asked 'what system do we have to MEL?' I also asked what the write-up stated. He said it wasn't written up yet. He finally said we needed to MEL the pack. So I did. The mechanic, the flight crew and a second flight crew accepted the MEL. Third flight crew questioned the MEL and after a total of 4 flts, item was fixed. The contributing factor was my lack of assertiveness and failure to follow proper feedback procedures. This was caused by my complacency.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B737-300 WAS DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH A R BODY OVERHEAT SYS FAULT. R PACK WAS DEFERRED AS INOP TO AVOID OVERHEAT WARNING.

Narrative: ON THE NIGHT OF APR/TUE/04 AT APPROX XA45, I RECEIVED A CALL FROM ZZZ1 LINE MAINT ASKING IF WE COULD MEL THE R-HAND PACK ON ACFT. I PLACED THE MECH ON HOLD AND CALLED DISPATCH. DISPATCHER SAID IT WAS OK. I HUNG UP WITH THE DISPATCHER AND PICKED BACK UP THE LINE WITH THE MECH. I TOLD THE MECH IT WAS OK. I THEN ASKED THE MECH WHAT WE HAD. HE EXPLAINED THE R PACK CAUSED A WING TO BODY OVERHEAT. I ASKED, 'A WING TO BODY OVERHEAT OR PACK OVERHEAT?' HE SEEMED UNSURE AND SAID THERE WERE NO LEAKS. I DON'T REMEMBER THE EXACT WORDS, BUT AFTER GOING BACK AND FORTH A LITTLE, I FINALLY ASKED 'WHAT SYS DO WE HAVE TO MEL?' I ALSO ASKED WHAT THE WRITE-UP STATED. HE SAID IT WASN'T WRITTEN UP YET. HE FINALLY SAID WE NEEDED TO MEL THE PACK. SO I DID. THE MECH, THE FLT CREW AND A SECOND FLT CREW ACCEPTED THE MEL. THIRD FLT CREW QUESTIONED THE MEL AND AFTER A TOTAL OF 4 FLTS, ITEM WAS FIXED. THE CONTRIBUTING FACTOR WAS MY LACK OF ASSERTIVENESS AND FAILURE TO FOLLOW PROPER FEEDBACK PROCS. THIS WAS CAUSED BY MY COMPLACENCY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.