Narrative:

May have been involved in a runway incursion. The WX was good and the wind was calm. The visibility was good, but some what restricted by the rising sun with some haze. Aircraft were landing and departing on all four of the runways, 4/22, 14/32. Recieved my IFR clearance, switched to CTAF and announced my takeoff intentions, but had to leave runway 32, because of landing aircraft on 14. Took off on 32 after 14 traffic cleared. I heard someone ask what my aircraft number was. Did not hear any other traffic announcing their possition of intentions. In retrospect, all traffic should have been using runway 22, as it is the calm wind runway.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: SMA PLT HAD RWY INCURSION AT EAU WHILE AT LEAST FOUR OTHER ACFT WERE LNDG AND DEPARTING ON ALL RWYS.

Narrative: MAY HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN A RWY INCURSION. THE WX WAS GOOD AND THE WIND WAS CALM. THE VISIBILITY WAS GOOD, BUT SOME WHAT RESTRICTED BY THE RISING SUN WITH SOME HAZE. ACFT WERE LNDG AND DEPARTING ON ALL FOUR OF THE RWYS, 4/22, 14/32. RECIEVED MY IFR CLEARANCE, SWITCHED TO CTAF AND ANNOUNCED MY TKOF INTENTIONS, BUT HAD TO LEAVE RWY 32, BECAUSE OF LANDING ACFT ON 14. TOOK OFF ON 32 AFTER 14 TRAFFIC CLEARED. I HEARD SOMEONE ASK WHAT MY ACFT NUMBER WAS. DID NOT HEAR ANY OTHER TRAFFIC ANNOUNCING THEIR POSSITION OF INTENTIONS. IN RETROSPECT, ALL TRAFFIC SHOULD HAVE BEEN USING RWY 22, AS IT IS THE CALM WIND RWY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.