Narrative:

During a period of low complexity and traffic volume, aircraft 1 checked on my frequency climbing to 17000 MSL. A climb to FL250 was issued. Aircraft 2 was on a crossing course level at FL180. Because of the climb rate of aircraft 1, I assumed that it would 'top' aircraft 2 with room to spare. Most of my attention was focused on reviewing approximately 20-30 proposal flight progress strips during the event. When it became apparent that separation would be lost, I requested that aircraft 1 increase its rate of climb. (It was apparent that the aircraft were not on collision course.) because of the light workload, I erroneously focused more attention on the tedious 'paperwork' of ATC, rather than on projection of control actions issued to the aircraft involved.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ZDC CTLR BECOMES DISTRACTED WITH ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES AND DOES NOT ENSURE SEPARATION BETWEEN A CLBING B737 AND AN ENRTE, LEVEL BE9L.

Narrative: DURING A PERIOD OF LOW COMPLEXITY AND TFC VOLUME, ACFT 1 CHECKED ON MY FREQUENCY CLBING TO 17000 MSL. A CLB TO FL250 WAS ISSUED. ACFT 2 WAS ON A CROSSING COURSE LEVEL AT FL180. BECAUSE OF THE CLIMB RATE OF ACFT 1, I ASSUMED THAT IT WOULD 'TOP' ACFT 2 WITH ROOM TO SPARE. MOST OF MY ATTENTION WAS FOCUSED ON REVIEWING APPROX 20-30 PROPOSAL FLT PROGRESS STRIPS DURING THE EVENT. WHEN IT BECAME APPARENT THAT SEPARATION WOULD BE LOST, I REQUESTED THAT ACFT 1 INCREASE ITS RATE OF CLB. (IT WAS APPARENT THAT THE ACFT WERE NOT ON COLLISION COURSE.) BECAUSE OF THE LIGHT WORKLOAD, I ERRONEOUSLY FOCUSED MORE ATTENTION ON THE TEDIOUS 'PAPERWORK' OF ATC, RATHER THAN ON PROJECTION OF CTL ACTIONS ISSUED TO THE ACFT INVOLVED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.