Narrative:

Upon departing msn, was told to level at 4000 ft due to traffic. Traffic was pointed out. I responded with aircraft in sight. The traffic was told to maintain 4500 ft. The aircraft did cross in front of me (right to left) at my altitude. I corrected to the right to resolve conflict. Asked controller what was going on. He responded that was the issued traffic. I said ok, but at my altitude. Controller, he is showing 4500 ft on the mdec. Controller asked the other aircraft what their altitude was with a current altitude setting. The controller said that he would write the incident up. After reviewing of incident do not know how to prevent this from occurring again. However, I initially thought that the problem may be with my altimeter. But, they (both) were set and verified on the ground with field elevation.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A CLBING BE99 HAS AN NMAC WITH A XING PIPER THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE 500 FT ABOVE HIS ALT 20 MI E OF MSN, WI.

Narrative: UPON DEPARTING MSN, WAS TOLD TO LEVEL AT 4000 FT DUE TO TFC. TFC WAS POINTED OUT. I RESPONDED WITH ACFT IN SIGHT. THE TFC WAS TOLD TO MAINTAIN 4500 FT. THE ACFT DID CROSS IN FRONT OF ME (R TO L) AT MY ALT. I CORRECTED TO THE R TO RESOLVE CONFLICT. ASKED CTLR WHAT WAS GOING ON. HE RESPONDED THAT WAS THE ISSUED TFC. I SAID OK, BUT AT MY ALT. CTLR, HE IS SHOWING 4500 FT ON THE MDEC. CTLR ASKED THE OTHER ACFT WHAT THEIR ALT WAS WITH A CURRENT ALT SETTING. THE CTLR SAID THAT HE WOULD WRITE THE INCIDENT UP. AFTER REVIEWING OF INCIDENT DO NOT KNOW HOW TO PREVENT THIS FROM OCCURRING AGAIN. HOWEVER, I INITIALLY THOUGHT THAT THE PROB MAY BE WITH MY ALTIMETER. BUT, THEY (BOTH) WERE SET AND VERIFIED ON THE GND WITH FIELD ELEVATION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.