![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 316433 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199509 |
| Day | Mon |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : sea |
| State Reference | WA |
| Altitude | agl bound lower : 800 agl bound upper : 900 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Dusk |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : sea |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Navigation In Use | Other Other |
| Flight Phase | descent : approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
| Operating Under FAR Part | other : unknown |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | other other : other pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : flight engineer pilot : atp |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 15000 flight time type : 1400 |
| ASRS Report | 316433 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | conflict : nmac other anomaly other |
| Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other flight crewa |
| Resolutory Action | flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course flight crew : took evasive action |
| Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
| Miss Distance | horizontal : 100 vertical : 100 |
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
We were cleared ILS runway 16R at seatac with a sidestep to runway 16L. At approximately 6 NM we saw the runway and made the transition by 5 NM. At 900 ft AGL we had an RA command to climb, the target showed slightly left and 800 ft AGL. I followed the commands and was about to make the missed approach when the 'clear of conflict' command was given. I returned to the GS (VASI) and made a normal, as possible, landing. Seatac tower was not very concerned. The only comment was 'it happens all the time.' 'it was probably a little guy off of boeing.' I think the solution is obvious, light aircraft have no business anywhere near final approach for a major airport. There should be a procedure at boeing to keep them away.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CAPT OF AN LGT TOOK EVASIVE ACTION DURING FINAL APCH IN RESPONSE TO A TCASII RA.
Narrative: WE WERE CLRED ILS RWY 16R AT SEATAC WITH A SIDESTEP TO RWY 16L. AT APPROX 6 NM WE SAW THE RWY AND MADE THE TRANSITION BY 5 NM. AT 900 FT AGL WE HAD AN RA COMMAND TO CLB, THE TARGET SHOWED SLIGHTLY L AND 800 FT AGL. I FOLLOWED THE COMMANDS AND WAS ABOUT TO MAKE THE MISSED APCH WHEN THE 'CLR OF CONFLICT' COMMAND WAS GIVEN. I RETURNED TO THE GS (VASI) AND MADE A NORMAL, AS POSSIBLE, LNDG. SEATAC TWR WAS NOT VERY CONCERNED. THE ONLY COMMENT WAS 'IT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME.' 'IT WAS PROBABLY A LITTLE GUY OFF OF BOEING.' I THINK THE SOLUTION IS OBVIOUS, LIGHT ACFT HAVE NO BUSINESS ANYWHERE NEAR FINAL APCH FOR A MAJOR ARPT. THERE SHOULD BE A PROC AT BOEING TO KEEP THEM AWAY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.