Loss of aircraft control on landing procedure rollout. Aircraft damaged during nose over.

Attributes
ACN	295740
Time
Date	199502
Day	Mon
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : enw
State Reference	WI
Altitude	agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Operator	general aviation : personal
Make Model Name	Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	landing other
Flight Plan	VFR
Person 1
Affiliation	Other
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : instrument pilot : flight engineer pilot : cfi pilot : commercial
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 5000 flight time type : 100
ASRS Report	295740
Person 2
Affiliation	Other
Function	flight crew : single pilot instruction : trainee
Qualification	pilot : student
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 0 flight time total : 70 flight time type : 50
ASRS Report	295739
Events
Anomaly	other anomaly other anomaly other other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	none taken : unable
Consequence	other
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

Upon landing, aircraft veered left and student corrected with right rudder. Going straight ahead, the aircraft veered slightly to the left and the aircraft made a large veer to the right. We hit a snowbank and the aircraft flipped upside down. The aircraft had no brakes on the instructor's side of the aircraft. I could not apply brakes, only rudder to try to stop the aircraft from swerving. I was unsuccessful in stopping the turning aircraft. I shut off the magnetos before we hit the snowbank. The 1946 aircraft should be retrofitted with brakes on both sides of aircraft. The design of the heel type brakes is a poor design. They can be applied inadvertently if the pilot uses the rudder which would multiply the problem.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: LOSS OF ACFT CTL ON LNDG PROC ROLLOUT. ACFT DAMAGED DURING NOSE OVER.

Narrative: UPON LNDG, ACFT VEERED L AND STUDENT CORRECTED WITH R RUDDER. GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD, THE ACFT VEERED SLIGHTLY TO THE L AND THE ACFT MADE A LARGE VEER TO THE R. WE HIT A SNOWBANK AND THE ACFT FLIPPED UPSIDE DOWN. THE ACFT HAD NO BRAKES ON THE INSTRUCTOR'S SIDE OF THE ACFT. I COULD NOT APPLY BRAKES, ONLY RUDDER TO TRY TO STOP THE ACFT FROM SWERVING. I WAS UNSUCCESSFUL IN STOPPING THE TURNING ACFT. I SHUT OFF THE MAGNETOS BEFORE WE HIT THE SNOWBANK. THE 1946 ACFT SHOULD BE RETROFITTED WITH BRAKES ON BOTH SIDES OF ACFT. THE DESIGN OF THE HEEL TYPE BRAKES IS A POOR DESIGN. THEY CAN BE APPLIED INADVERTENTLY IF THE PLT USES THE RUDDER WHICH WOULD MULTIPLY THE PROB.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.