Narrative:

Small aircraft single engine aircraft in which I was flying was on straight-in visual approach to runway 35. Conditions were broken ceiling greater than 5000 and visibility greater than 5 mi. An medium large transport was on an ILS to runway 4. The approach ends of runways 35 and 4 cross each other. I was told to maintain visual separation from the medium large transport and cleared to land on runway 35. I was never told whether I was to land before or after the medium large transport. I was never asked my approach speed, nor was I asked to keep my speed up or slow down. I arrived over the approach end of runway 35 shortly after the medium large transport had landed (it was still on the runway). Had I not maintained a high approach, I believe I would have lost control in the wake turbulence of the medium large transport.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: SMA ON VISUAL APCH CLRED TO LAND WITH MLG LNDG ON INTERSECTING RWY.

Narrative: SMA SINGLE ENG ACFT IN WHICH I WAS FLYING WAS ON STRAIGHT-IN VISUAL APCH TO RWY 35. CONDITIONS WERE BROKEN CEILING GREATER THAN 5000 AND VISIBILITY GREATER THAN 5 MI. AN MLG WAS ON AN ILS TO RWY 4. THE APCH ENDS OF RWYS 35 AND 4 CROSS EACH OTHER. I WAS TOLD TO MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION FROM THE MLG AND CLRED TO LAND ON RWY 35. I WAS NEVER TOLD WHETHER I WAS TO LAND BEFORE OR AFTER THE MLG. I WAS NEVER ASKED MY APCH SPD, NOR WAS I ASKED TO KEEP MY SPD UP OR SLOW DOWN. I ARRIVED OVER THE APCH END OF RWY 35 SHORTLY AFTER THE MLG HAD LANDED (IT WAS STILL ON THE RWY). HAD I NOT MAINTAINED A HIGH APCH, I BELIEVE I WOULD HAVE LOST CTL IN THE WAKE TURB OF THE MLG.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.