Narrative:

Air carrier X departure from rdu climbing to FL230 given to next sector (high sector) out of FL180, observed climbing to FL260 in data block. Military aircraft Y cruising at FL230 nebnd crossing air carrier X track. Should have been no factor and below air carrier X if air carrier X not descended and turned. Became aware of air carrier X seeming to level at FL230 and then descending and turning in my airspace, so turned military aircraft Y to north heading, then west heading and descended to FL220. Military aircraft Y had air carrier X in sight. Wasn't aware that high sector controller was turning air carrier X southwest and descending, putting it into path of military aircraft Y. Lack of coordination between low sector controller (myself) and high sector controller seemed to be problem, since both took corrective action but aircraft turned same direction because of lack of coordination.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR X HAD LESS THAN STANDARD SEPARATION FROM MIL ACFT Y. SYSTEM ERROR.

Narrative: ACR X DEP FROM RDU CLBING TO FL230 GIVEN TO NEXT SECTOR (HIGH SECTOR) OUT OF FL180, OBSERVED CLBING TO FL260 IN DATA BLOCK. MIL ACFT Y CRUISING AT FL230 NEBND XING ACR X TRACK. SHOULD HAVE BEEN NO FACTOR AND BELOW ACR X IF ACR X NOT DSNDED AND TURNED. BECAME AWARE OF ACR X SEEMING TO LEVEL AT FL230 AND THEN DSNDING AND TURNING IN MY AIRSPACE, SO TURNED MIL ACFT Y TO N HDG, THEN W HDG AND DSNDED TO FL220. MIL ACFT Y HAD ACR X IN SIGHT. WASN'T AWARE THAT HIGH SECTOR CTLR WAS TURNING ACR X SW AND DSNDING, PUTTING IT INTO PATH OF MIL ACFT Y. LACK OF COORD BTWN LOW SECTOR CTLR (MYSELF) AND HIGH SECTOR CTLR SEEMED TO BE PROB, SINCE BOTH TOOK CORRECTIVE ACTION BUT ACFT TURNED SAME DIRECTION BECAUSE OF LACK OF COORD.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.