Narrative:

On visibility approach to runway 24R in dayton approach from the north, ATC asked if we had airport in sight. I asked first officer which was flying while pointing to the airport, he responded by 'airport in sight' I then relayed this to ATC. At that time we needed to start a turn towards the runway within 1 to 2 mi however the first officer continued straight ahead while maintaining altitude to the military airport in our 12 O'clock position. I was distraction at the time by communicating with our operations that I did not catch the deviation until I noticed the localizer course coming and going out of view. I responded by announcing localizer alive. By now the first officer caught his mistake and immediately turned towards the runway. We overflew the parallel runway at 3000' or 4000' which was assigned by ATC. There was traffic below us that I observed that we were well above. We were actually crossing the runway (parallel) centerline which caused the conflict with ATC. I feel like this could have been avoided by me the captain, verifying for sure first officer had proper airport in sight and continued to monitor his progress and not allowing unimportant distrs to interfere. Again no traffic conflict or traffic problem existed. Only from the view from approach control which handled the situation professionally!

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR MLG OVERSHOOTS APCH RWY ON A VISUAL APCH.

Narrative: ON VIS APCH TO RWY 24R IN DAYTON APCH FROM THE N, ATC ASKED IF WE HAD ARPT IN SIGHT. I ASKED F/O WHICH WAS FLYING WHILE POINTING TO THE ARPT, HE RESPONDED BY 'ARPT IN SIGHT' I THEN RELAYED THIS TO ATC. AT THAT TIME WE NEEDED TO START A TURN TOWARDS THE RWY WITHIN 1 TO 2 MI HOWEVER THE F/O CONTINUED STRAIGHT AHEAD WHILE MAINTAINING ALT TO THE MIL ARPT IN OUR 12 O'CLOCK POS. I WAS DISTR AT THE TIME BY COMMUNICATING WITH OUR OPS THAT I DID NOT CATCH THE DEVIATION UNTIL I NOTICED THE LOC COURSE COMING AND GOING OUT OF VIEW. I RESPONDED BY ANNOUNCING LOC ALIVE. BY NOW THE F/O CAUGHT HIS MISTAKE AND IMMEDIATELY TURNED TOWARDS THE RWY. WE OVERFLEW THE PARALLEL RWY AT 3000' OR 4000' WHICH WAS ASSIGNED BY ATC. THERE WAS TFC BELOW US THAT I OBSERVED THAT WE WERE WELL ABOVE. WE WERE ACTUALLY XING THE RWY (PARALLEL) CENTERLINE WHICH CAUSED THE CONFLICT WITH ATC. I FEEL LIKE THIS COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED BY ME THE CAPT, VERIFYING FOR SURE F/O HAD PROPER ARPT IN SIGHT AND CONTINUED TO MONITOR HIS PROGRESS AND NOT ALLOWING UNIMPORTANT DISTRS TO INTERFERE. AGAIN NO TFC CONFLICT OR TFC PROB EXISTED. ONLY FROM THE VIEW FROM APCH CTL WHICH HANDLED THE SITUATION PROFESSIONALLY!

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.