Narrative:

Landed on runway 30 lgb after tower was closed. The airport is very complicated and I was afraid to try to taxi back to runway 30 west/O 'progressive taxiing' from ground control for fear of taxiing across an active runway. I departed from a runway (25L) that I was very familiar with. The next day I asked my flight instrument about it. I was then informed that I 1) violated noise abatement procedures, and 2) departed from a closed runway. There was no indication from ATIS of closed and active runways.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: SMA PLT DEPARTED ON CLOSED RWY. VIOLATED NOISE ABATEMENT PROCS.

Narrative: LANDED ON RWY 30 LGB AFTER TWR WAS CLOSED. THE ARPT IS VERY COMPLICATED AND I WAS AFRAID TO TRY TO TAXI BACK TO RWY 30 W/O 'PROGRESSIVE TAXIING' FROM GND CTL FOR FEAR OF TAXIING ACROSS AN ACTIVE RWY. I DEPARTED FROM A RWY (25L) THAT I WAS VERY FAMILIAR WITH. THE NEXT DAY I ASKED MY FLT INSTR ABOUT IT. I WAS THEN INFORMED THAT I 1) VIOLATED NOISE ABATEMENT PROCS, AND 2) DEPARTED FROM A CLOSED RWY. THERE WAS NO INDICATION FROM ATIS OF CLOSED AND ACTIVE RWYS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.