![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1280924 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201507 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ATL.Airport |
| State Reference | GA |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER/LR (CRJ200) |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Takeoff Initial Climb |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | A319 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Climb Climb |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Speed All Types Inflight Event / Encounter Wake Vortex Encounter |
Narrative:
On takeoff from 26L behind an airbus A319; at about 50-100 ft and V2+15; we encountered a wake turbulence event. We were cleared to takeoff as the previous aircraft was just about rotating. The takeoff was normal; with normal pitch rate and speed. The aircraft buffeted; rolled left and right about 10 to 15 degrees; and stick shaker activated for about 1 second. The ca was PF and countered the rolling motion with the flight controls; lowered the nose and increased thrust to decrease the aoa. The event lasted only a few seconds and we returned to the normal takeoff profile.undesired aircraft state was the stick shaker at an altitude of about 50-100 ft; a rolling motion; and buffet. This is the third time I have experienced this same exact event behind an A319/320. I do not recall if I filed an as soon as possible or not. In all three cases; the sequence and type of events were identical. It seems that the A319/320 creates an unusual and/or significant wake turbulence. I believe the FAA needs to review the wake created by the A319/320. I also believe that the FAA should review the separation criteria for aircraft departing behind it. I view this as a significant safety issue and it should be reviewed by both the company and the FAA.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CRJ200 FO reported encountering wake turbulence in trail of an A319 after takeoff from ATL.
Narrative: On takeoff from 26L behind an Airbus A319; at about 50-100 FT and V2+15; we encountered a wake turbulence event. We were cleared to takeoff as the previous aircraft was just about rotating. The takeoff was normal; with normal pitch rate and speed. The aircraft buffeted; rolled left and right about 10 to 15 degrees; and stick shaker activated for about 1 second. The CA was PF and countered the rolling motion with the flight controls; lowered the nose and increased thrust to decrease the AOA. The event lasted only a few seconds and we returned to the normal takeoff profile.Undesired aircraft state was the stick shaker at an altitude of about 50-100 FT; a rolling motion; and buffet. This is the third time I have experienced this same exact event behind an A319/320. I do not recall if I filed an ASAP or not. In all three cases; the sequence and type of events were identical. It seems that the A319/320 creates an unusual and/or significant wake turbulence. I believe the FAA needs to review the wake created by the A319/320. I also believe that the FAA should review the separation criteria for aircraft departing behind it. I view this as a significant safety issue and it should be reviewed by both the company and the FAA.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.