 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
A crj-200 flight crew rejected their takeoff when both nose gear tires failed.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 996948 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201203 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER/LR (CRJ200) |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Takeoff |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Nose Gear Tire |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical |
Narrative:
Taxi out to the runway was normal. We received our takeoff clearance and applied takeoff power. Around 80 KTS felt a vibration and unusual noise. Around 110 KTS the takeoff was aborted. We reported the rejected takeoff to ATC; exited the runway and parked the airplane. [We] ran the QRH for rejected takeoff; contacted maintenance and operations. Airport operations came out to the airplane and told us over the radio that both nose tires were blown. Eventually we were towed back to the gate with an electro tug.I wasn't the pilot flying; but the captain said the aircraft's direction was difficult to control. He rejected the takeoff because the vibration and unusual noise became progressively worse. Runway centerline was maintained throughout the reject procedure.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CRJ-200 flight crew rejected their takeoff when both nose gear tires failed.
Narrative: Taxi out to the runway was normal. We received our takeoff clearance and applied takeoff power. Around 80 KTS felt a vibration and unusual noise. Around 110 KTS the takeoff was aborted. We reported the rejected takeoff to ATC; exited the runway and parked the airplane. [We] ran the QRH for rejected takeoff; contacted Maintenance and Operations. Airport Operations came out to the airplane and told us over the radio that both nose tires were blown. Eventually we were towed back to the gate with an electro tug.I wasn't the pilot flying; but the Captain said the aircraft's direction was difficult to control. He rejected the takeoff because the vibration and unusual noise became progressively worse. Runway centerline was maintained throughout the reject procedure.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.