 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
A CRJ200 pilot rejected the takeoff at 100 KTS with a 138 KT V1 because of a wing overheat light during icing conditions.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 647248 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200502 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : roc.airport |
| State Reference | NY |
| Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | IMC |
| Weather Elements | Snow |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER&LR |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | ground : takeoff roll |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 210 flight time total : 4950 |
| ASRS Report | 647248 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other anomaly other |
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
| Resolutory Action | flight crew : rejected takeoff |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Weather Aircraft |
| Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
Departing roc on runway 4; about 3-4 inches of snow had already fallen. Runway 4 was clean and only wet. The snow intensity was about medium intensity. We deiced the aircraft after pushback with type 1 and type 4 fluids. We performed a reduced visibility takeoff with both wings and cowl anti-ice on. Shortly after the 100 KT call; approximately 110 KTS or less; we received master warning wing overheat. I elected to abort the takeoff; not knowing how long the aircraft would be in icing conditions after takeoff. The current WX contributed to my decision to abort after 100 KTS; but prior to V1; which was 138 KTS.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CRJ200 PLT REJECTED THE TKOF AT 100 KTS WITH A 138 KT V1 BECAUSE OF A WING OVERHEAT LIGHT DURING ICING CONDITIONS.
Narrative: DEPARTING ROC ON RWY 4; ABOUT 3-4 INCHES OF SNOW HAD ALREADY FALLEN. RWY 4 WAS CLEAN AND ONLY WET. THE SNOW INTENSITY WAS ABOUT MEDIUM INTENSITY. WE DEICED THE ACFT AFTER PUSHBACK WITH TYPE 1 AND TYPE 4 FLUIDS. WE PERFORMED A REDUCED VISIBILITY TKOF WITH BOTH WINGS AND COWL ANTI-ICE ON. SHORTLY AFTER THE 100 KT CALL; APPROX 110 KTS OR LESS; WE RECEIVED MASTER WARNING WING OVERHEAT. I ELECTED TO ABORT THE TKOF; NOT KNOWING HOW LONG THE ACFT WOULD BE IN ICING CONDITIONS AFTER TKOF. THE CURRENT WX CONTRIBUTED TO MY DECISION TO ABORT AFTER 100 KTS; BUT PRIOR TO V1; WHICH WAS 138 KTS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.