![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 904930 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201008 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | MRI.Airport |
| State Reference | AK |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Cessna 310/T310C |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Cruise |
| Route In Use | None |
| Flight Plan | VFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
| Flight Plan | VFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Local |
| Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Single Pilot Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 155 Flight Crew Total 4000 Flight Crew Type 986 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict NMAC |
Narrative:
I was informed of a possible near midair collision between a C310 and a C172. I was working a short spurt of complex busy traffic. I did not talk to the C310 until after the event had transpired. At the time of the event I was focused on numerous aircraft in the pattern and on the runways. I issued traffic observed to the C172 prior to transferring control to A11; I did not observe the C310 on the radar at that point. Recommendation; both the ground controller and controller in charge say they were telling me about the traffic; however two way communication was never established. A simple touch on the shoulder or walking over and pointing to the radar targets could have achieved the communication. Also; and more importantly; a drop zone for the pattern on stars has never been instituted even though it's been suggested on numerous occasions. The MSAW/ca goes off incessantly; rendering it useless.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MRI Controller was advised of a possible NMAC that reportedly occurred during a brief complex traffic period but went unnoticed by the reporter.
Narrative: I was informed of a possible NMAC between a C310 and a C172. I was working a short spurt of complex busy traffic. I did not talk to the C310 until after the event had transpired. At the time of the event I was focused on numerous aircraft in the pattern and on the runways. I issued traffic observed to the C172 prior to transferring control to A11; I did not observe the C310 on the RADAR at that point. Recommendation; both the Ground Controller and CIC say they were telling me about the traffic; however two way communication was never established. A simple touch on the shoulder or walking over and pointing to the RADAR targets could have achieved the communication. Also; and more importantly; a drop zone for the pattern on STARS has never been instituted even though it's been suggested on numerous occasions. The MSAW/CA goes off incessantly; rendering it useless.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.