Narrative:

We were inbound to dfw. Delays on arrival including holding, vectors and several speed changes. Flight with similar flight number on frequency. We were given descent to 8000' from 11000' by dfw approach controller after passing scurry VOR on scurry nine arrival. At 10500' given immediate climb to 11000' and right turn of 20 degree to 30 degree, due to two departure aircraft at 12 O'clock climbing to 10000'. Controller said she made mistake and clearance was for the flight with similar call sign but she had used our flight number with clearance, and we acknowledged receipt of it. Nearest aircraft (air carrier Y) was 2 to 3 NM ahead when we climbed back to 11000' (had descended to about 10300') and we did pick it up visually. Controller was nearly overloaded with arrival aircraft and using vectors and speed changes to space aircraft for approach. This and two similar flight numbers caused this conflict to occur. Situation was corrected prior to a dangerous condition but a few more seconds could have been disastrous. Report filed with company to change one flight number so this will not be as likely to recur. We suspect the approach controller radar conflict alert was sounded and a report may be made by the controller involved. Supplemental information from acn #87091: the approach controller appeared to be working at maximum capacity and an error of one digit on our call sign.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: LESS THAN STANDARD SEPARATION BETWEEN TWO ACR ACFT. OPERATIONAL ERROR.

Narrative: WE WERE INBOUND TO DFW. DELAYS ON ARRIVAL INCLUDING HOLDING, VECTORS AND SEVERAL SPEED CHANGES. FLT WITH SIMILAR FLT NUMBER ON FREQ. WE WERE GIVEN DESCENT TO 8000' FROM 11000' BY DFW APCH CTLR AFTER PASSING SCURRY VOR ON SCURRY NINE ARRIVAL. AT 10500' GIVEN IMMEDIATE CLIMB TO 11000' AND RIGHT TURN OF 20 DEG TO 30 DEG, DUE TO TWO DEP ACFT AT 12 O'CLOCK CLIMBING TO 10000'. CTLR SAID SHE MADE MISTAKE AND CLRNC WAS FOR THE FLT WITH SIMILAR CALL SIGN BUT SHE HAD USED OUR FLT NUMBER WITH CLRNC, AND WE ACKNOWLEDGED RECEIPT OF IT. NEAREST ACFT (ACR Y) WAS 2 TO 3 NM AHEAD WHEN WE CLIMBED BACK TO 11000' (HAD DESCENDED TO ABOUT 10300') AND WE DID PICK IT UP VISUALLY. CTLR WAS NEARLY OVERLOADED WITH ARRIVAL ACFT AND USING VECTORS AND SPEED CHANGES TO SPACE ACFT FOR APCH. THIS AND TWO SIMILAR FLT NUMBERS CAUSED THIS CONFLICT TO OCCUR. SITUATION WAS CORRECTED PRIOR TO A DANGEROUS CONDITION BUT A FEW MORE SECONDS COULD HAVE BEEN DISASTROUS. REPORT FILED WITH COMPANY TO CHANGE ONE FLT NUMBER SO THIS WILL NOT BE AS LIKELY TO RECUR. WE SUSPECT THE APCH CTLR RADAR CONFLICT ALERT WAS SOUNDED AND A REPORT MAY BE MADE BY THE CTLR INVOLVED. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM ACN #87091: THE APCH CTLR APPEARED TO BE WORKING AT MAXIMUM CAPACITY AND AN ERROR OF ONE DIGIT ON OUR CALL SIGN.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.