Narrative:

Third leg of the trip. There had been some CRM issues on the preceding leg. This was a line check on the captain and I was the PF. ZDV switched our arrival STAR twice and runway assignments multiple times. Effectively; I performed 3 or 4 briefs for our approach. By the time we were issued our final runway assignment we were below 15000 ft and I did not brief a full ILS because the WX conditions in denver led me to believe it would be a visual approach. We were cleared for the approach and inside bengl I asked for 7000 ft to be set in the altitude window. The note; which I read; corresponded to localizer GS only approach; so I thought I was ok to descend below the 8000 ft. But the note I read did not correspond to the actual situation. The company check airperson pointed this out on our debrief.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A320 FO ASKS FOR 7000 VICE 8000 PASSING BENGL ON THE ILS 34R APCH AT DEN.

Narrative: THIRD LEG OF THE TRIP. THERE HAD BEEN SOME CRM ISSUES ON THE PRECEDING LEG. THIS WAS A LINE CHK ON THE CAPT AND I WAS THE PF. ZDV SWITCHED OUR ARR STAR TWICE AND RWY ASSIGNMENTS MULTIPLE TIMES. EFFECTIVELY; I PERFORMED 3 OR 4 BRIEFS FOR OUR APCH. BY THE TIME WE WERE ISSUED OUR FINAL RWY ASSIGNMENT WE WERE BELOW 15000 FT AND I DID NOT BRIEF A FULL ILS BECAUSE THE WX CONDITIONS IN DENVER LED ME TO BELIEVE IT WOULD BE A VISUAL APCH. WE WERE CLRED FOR THE APCH AND INSIDE BENGL I ASKED FOR 7000 FT TO BE SET IN THE ALT WINDOW. THE NOTE; WHICH I READ; CORRESPONDED TO LOC GS ONLY APCH; SO I THOUGHT I WAS OK TO DSND BELOW THE 8000 FT. BUT THE NOTE I READ DID NOT CORRESPOND TO THE ACTUAL SITUATION. THE COMPANY CHK AIRPERSON POINTED THIS OUT ON OUR DEBRIEF.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.