Narrative:

After landing we were told of an outbound delay for maintenance. The maintenance was to install an APU part that was omitted when the APU was installed. We had flown in an apparently unairworthy condition. We had no knowledge of the missing component and successfully utilized the APU for departure and arrival. Perhaps our maintenance procedures need to be reviewed. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter stated he understood the missing part was an APU fluid drain line. The maintenance time needed for installing the missing part was very short.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B757-200 FLIGHT CREW WAS INFORMED AFTER BLOCK IN THAT THE ACFT WAS MISSING AN APU PART NOT INSTALLED DURING THE PREVIOUS DAY APU CHANGE. CREW BELIEVES THEY MAY HAVE FLOWN AN UN-AIRWORTHY ACFT.

Narrative: AFTER LNDG WE WERE TOLD OF AN OUTBOUND DELAY FOR MAINT. THE MAINT WAS TO INSTALL AN APU PART THAT WAS OMITTED WHEN THE APU WAS INSTALLED. WE HAD FLOWN IN AN APPARENTLY UNAIRWORTHY CONDITION. WE HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE MISSING COMPONENT AND SUCCESSFULLY UTILIZED THE APU FOR DEP AND ARR. PERHAPS OUR MAINT PROCS NEED TO BE REVIEWED. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: REPORTER STATED HE UNDERSTOOD THE MISSING PART WAS AN APU FLUID DRAIN LINE. THE MAINT TIME NEEDED FOR INSTALLING THE MISSING PART WAS VERY SHORT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.