![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 703404 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 200607 | 
| Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport | 
| State Reference | US | 
| Altitude | agl single value : 0 | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 | 
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier | 
| Function | flight crew : first officer | 
| Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : flight engineer pilot : commercial pilot : instrument  | 
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 10000 flight time type : 5000  | 
| ASRS Report | 703404 | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : far  | 
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa | 
| Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted | 
| Consequence | other | 
| Factors | |
| Maintenance | performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements performance deficiency : scheduled maintenance  | 
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Aircraft Company  | 
| Primary Problem | Company | 
Narrative:
I work for a cargo carrier. We are currently flying with no ELT. The company removed it from the airplane; it was inoperative to use a 90 day dmi. I brought to the attention of management far 121.353 and they assured me this is completely legal; as our MEL is a part 121 document. I did get them to put a handheld emergency position indicating radio beacon on board so long as it doesn't conflict with overwater flts. I still feel this is an extremely unsafe situation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FO RPTS COMPANY FAILS TO COMPLY WITH FAR ELT REQUIREMENT.
Narrative: I WORK FOR A CARGO CARRIER. WE ARE CURRENTLY FLYING WITH NO ELT. THE COMPANY REMOVED IT FROM THE AIRPLANE; IT WAS INOP TO USE A 90 DAY DMI. I BROUGHT TO THE ATTN OF MGMNT FAR 121.353 AND THEY ASSURED ME THIS IS COMPLETELY LEGAL; AS OUR MEL IS A PART 121 DOCUMENT. I DID GET THEM TO PUT A HANDHELD EMER POS INDICATING RADIO BEACON ON BOARD SO LONG AS IT DOESN'T CONFLICT WITH OVERWATER FLTS. I STILL FEEL THIS IS AN EXTREMELY UNSAFE SITUATION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.