Narrative:

Our aircraft was inbtwn 2 lines of storms, deviating for WX. We were cleared to deviate by ATC. Controller asked for as much left as we could. We gave him 10 degrees which was as far as we could without going into the WX (level 4+ storms). Apparently there was an opposite direction airplane at the same altitude also deviating. Almost simultaneously the controller gave us a climb to FL360 as we received an RA to climb. I clicked off the autoplt and climbed. After evasive maneuver we were cleared back to FL350. Personal note: I think the controller did a great job by issuing an even altitude clearance. There is much talk about 'opening' these altitudes in the future. Perhaps these altitudes should be unusable for filing a flight plan, but available for controller use in these types of sits.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B737-800 FO CLBED IN RESPONSE TO TCASII RA AND ARTCC CTLR CLRNC CAUSED BY OPPOSITE DIRECTION TFC AT SIMILAR ALT.

Narrative: OUR ACFT WAS INBTWN 2 LINES OF STORMS, DEVIATING FOR WX. WE WERE CLRED TO DEVIATE BY ATC. CTLR ASKED FOR AS MUCH L AS WE COULD. WE GAVE HIM 10 DEGS WHICH WAS AS FAR AS WE COULD WITHOUT GOING INTO THE WX (LEVEL 4+ STORMS). APPARENTLY THERE WAS AN OPPOSITE DIRECTION AIRPLANE AT THE SAME ALT ALSO DEVIATING. ALMOST SIMULTANEOUSLY THE CTLR GAVE US A CLB TO FL360 AS WE RECEIVED AN RA TO CLB. I CLICKED OFF THE AUTOPLT AND CLBED. AFTER EVASIVE MANEUVER WE WERE CLRED BACK TO FL350. PERSONAL NOTE: I THINK THE CTLR DID A GREAT JOB BY ISSUING AN EVEN ALT CLRNC. THERE IS MUCH TALK ABOUT 'OPENING' THESE ALTS IN THE FUTURE. PERHAPS THESE ALTS SHOULD BE UNUSABLE FOR FILING A FLT PLAN, BUT AVAILABLE FOR CTLR USE IN THESE TYPES OF SITS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.