An ATR42 flight crew on landing runway 11 creates a potential conflict with traffic on approach to runway 22 when performing a go around after the IOE trainee captain bounces the landing at ewr, nj.

Home

Browse by month

Random

Latest

About

Contact

Attributes
ACN	508827
Time
Date	200104
Day	Mon
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : ewr.airport
State Reference	NT
Altitude	agl single value : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tower : ewr.tower artcc : eggx.artcc
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	Medium Transport, High Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Flight Phase	landing : roll landing : go around
Flight Plan	IFR
Aircraft 2
Controlling Facilities	tower : ewr.tower
Flight Phase	descent : approach
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer instruction : instructor oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp pilot : cfi
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 250 flight time total : 4000 flight time type : 2500
ASRS Report	508827
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain instruction : trainee
Events
Anomaly	conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : required legal separation other anomaly
Independent Detector	other flight crewa other flight crewb
Resolutory Action	flight crew : executed go around flight crew : regained aircraft control
Consequence	faa : reviewed incident with flight crew other other
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Flight Crew Human Performance
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance

Narrative:

I was conducting IOE for an initial captain. The trainee bounced the landing and executed a go around, which was poor judgement on his part. There was also traffic arriving to an intersecting runway which we climbed over. The go around procedure itself was not very good. The FAA was also conducting an observation of this flight. They (fed) stated that the trainee did not pass his observation. I agreed that the trainee needed more IOE and was not ready for upgrade. Also, during the debrief, the fed asked a question about our route of flight. He suspected we may have been off course, but I am certain we were not. ATC never stated or advised we were off course. The fed also stated his headset was 'cutting out' periodically so he may have heard our clearance wrong.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN ATR42 FLC ON LNDG RWY 11 CREATES A POTENTIAL CONFLICT WITH TFC ON APCH TO RWY 22 WHEN PERFORMING A GAR AFTER THE IOE TRAINEE CAPT BOUNCES THE LNDG AT EWR, NJ.

Narrative: I WAS CONDUCTING IOE FOR AN INITIAL CAPT. THE TRAINEE BOUNCED THE LNDG AND EXECUTED A GAR, WHICH WAS POOR JUDGEMENT ON HIS PART. THERE WAS ALSO TFC ARRIVING TO AN INTERSECTING RWY WHICH WE CLBED OVER. THE GAR PROC ITSELF WAS NOT VERY GOOD. THE FAA WAS ALSO CONDUCTING AN OBSERVATION OF THIS FLT. THEY (FED) STATED THAT THE TRAINEE DID NOT PASS HIS OBSERVATION. I AGREED THAT THE TRAINEE NEEDED MORE IOE AND WAS NOT READY FOR UPGRADE. ALSO, DURING THE DEBRIEF, THE FED ASKED A QUESTION ABOUT OUR RTE OF FLT. HE SUSPECTED WE MAY HAVE BEEN OFF COURSE, BUT I AM CERTAIN WE WERE NOT. ATC NEVER STATED OR ADVISED WE WERE OFF COURSE. THE FED ALSO STATED HIS HEADSET WAS 'CUTTING OUT' PERIODICALLY SO HE MAY HAVE HEARD OUR CLRNC WRONG.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.