Narrative:

While cruising at FL250, got 'avionics smoke warning.' this required landing as soon as possible, so we diverted to rdu airport -- almost directly underneath us. While we descended, we did the emergency checklist. A normal landing was made on runway 5R. Maintenance determined it was a false warning, and replaced the avionics smoke detector. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter advised that the flight crew coordinated the problem with ATC, donned their oxygen masks, and effected an emergency descent. Maintenance later advised that the computer compartment ventilation computer and smoke detector were replaced, but it was not immediately evident which equipment had faulted. In discussion with other pilots, none had encountered this problem. Being in the vicinity of an airport acceptable for their size was a plus, but the reporter stated that the checklist was a real challenge to complete prior to landing -- especially since the checklist required a number of computer un-power and re-power steps. Reporter was advised by maintenance that the equipment compartment ventilation computer 'had been changed out recently' but circumstances were unknown.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A319 FLC DIVERTS AND LANDS IN EMER CONDITION DUE TO AN AVIONICS SMOKE WARNING ALARM.

Narrative: WHILE CRUISING AT FL250, GOT 'AVIONICS SMOKE WARNING.' THIS REQUIRED LNDG ASAP, SO WE DIVERTED TO RDU ARPT -- ALMOST DIRECTLY UNDERNEATH US. WHILE WE DSNDED, WE DID THE EMER CHKLIST. A NORMAL LNDG WAS MADE ON RWY 5R. MAINT DETERMINED IT WAS A FALSE WARNING, AND REPLACED THE AVIONICS SMOKE DETECTOR. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR ADVISED THAT THE FLC COORDINATED THE PROB WITH ATC, DONNED THEIR OXYGEN MASKS, AND EFFECTED AN EMER DSCNT. MAINT LATER ADVISED THAT THE COMPUTER COMPARTMENT VENTILATION COMPUTER AND SMOKE DETECTOR WERE REPLACED, BUT IT WAS NOT IMMEDIATELY EVIDENT WHICH EQUIP HAD FAULTED. IN DISCUSSION WITH OTHER PLTS, NONE HAD ENCOUNTERED THIS PROB. BEING IN THE VICINITY OF AN ARPT ACCEPTABLE FOR THEIR SIZE WAS A PLUS, BUT THE RPTR STATED THAT THE CHKLIST WAS A REAL CHALLENGE TO COMPLETE PRIOR TO LNDG -- ESPECIALLY SINCE THE CHKLIST REQUIRED A NUMBER OF COMPUTER UN-PWR AND RE-PWR STEPS. RPTR WAS ADVISED BY MAINT THAT THE EQUIP COMPARTMENT VENTILATION COMPUTER 'HAD BEEN CHANGED OUT RECENTLY' BUT CIRCUMSTANCES WERE UNKNOWN.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.