Narrative:

In order to change the #1 IRU on a boeing 737-300 you must remove the static lines to the #2 dadc. This is the incident which occurred to me. After reinstalling the #1 IRU, the static lines, which were laying beside the east/east rack, were 'out of sight, out of mind.' after leaving ZZZ airport and landing in XXX the crew had maintenance look at the aircraft because airspeed (first officer's) was inaccurate (+/-200 KTS). After completing a series of bite tests and #2 dadc bite, no discrepancies were noted. The flight crew again took the aircraft but returned to the gate this time. It was found that the 2 static liens to the #2 dadc were not connected.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B737-300 WAS DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH THE #2 AIR DATA COMPUTER PITOT AND STATIC LINES NOT CONNECTED AFTER AN INERTIAL REF UNIT CHANGE.

Narrative: IN ORDER TO CHANGE THE #1 IRU ON A BOEING 737-300 YOU MUST REMOVE THE STATIC LINES TO THE #2 DADC. THIS IS THE INCIDENT WHICH OCCURRED TO ME. AFTER REINSTALLING THE #1 IRU, THE STATIC LINES, WHICH WERE LAYING BESIDE THE E/E RACK, WERE 'OUT OF SIGHT, OUT OF MIND.' AFTER LEAVING ZZZ ARPT AND LNDG IN XXX THE CREW HAD MAINT LOOK AT THE ACFT BECAUSE AIRSPD (FO'S) WAS INACCURATE (+/-200 KTS). AFTER COMPLETING A SERIES OF BITE TESTS AND #2 DADC BITE, NO DISCREPANCIES WERE NOTED. THE FLC AGAIN TOOK THE ACFT BUT RETURNED TO THE GATE THIS TIME. IT WAS FOUND THAT THE 2 STATIC LIENS TO THE #2 DADC WERE NOT CONNECTED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.