Narrative:

On IFR flight plan to land at apa, I was given a steep descent profile from FL190 to ILS runway 35R at apa. During continual descent of up to 2000 FPM, I was fast during the final phase of the approach. I landed long and found that the runway surface was icy so that braking only led to instant sliding. Therefore, I was unable to use brakes and rolled off the end of the runway onto the sod, which was frozen. I was not rolling very fast and so made a wide 180 degree turn and taxied back onto the runway and exited at the nearest taxiway. I reported braking to be nil. No damage was sustained to either aircraft or airport facility. I must have been the first landing after the storm because ATC did not mention braking. As a pilot of a piston twin, I often wish that ATC would not give such steep descent profiles because of necessary care and attention needed for some engines. For my part, I could have gone around but that would have required a missed approach and I already had the runway visually. No damage was done, but I obviously was not in speed and distance limits, given the runway conditions.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: PLT OF AN SMT TWIN LOST CTL OF THE ACFT DURING LNDG DUE TO NIL BRAKING ACTION ON AN ICY RWY AND TOO HIGH AND FAST DURING TOUCHDOWN.

Narrative: ON IFR FLT PLAN TO LAND AT APA, I WAS GIVEN A STEEP DSCNT PROFILE FROM FL190 TO ILS RWY 35R AT APA. DURING CONTINUAL DSCNT OF UP TO 2000 FPM, I WAS FAST DURING THE FINAL PHASE OF THE APCH. I LANDED LONG AND FOUND THAT THE RWY SURFACE WAS ICY SO THAT BRAKING ONLY LED TO INSTANT SLIDING. THEREFORE, I WAS UNABLE TO USE BRAKES AND ROLLED OFF THE END OF THE RWY ONTO THE SOD, WHICH WAS FROZEN. I WAS NOT ROLLING VERY FAST AND SO MADE A WIDE 180 DEG TURN AND TAXIED BACK ONTO THE RWY AND EXITED AT THE NEAREST TXWY. I RPTED BRAKING TO BE NIL. NO DAMAGE WAS SUSTAINED TO EITHER ACFT OR ARPT FACILITY. I MUST HAVE BEEN THE FIRST LNDG AFTER THE STORM BECAUSE ATC DID NOT MENTION BRAKING. AS A PLT OF A PISTON TWIN, I OFTEN WISH THAT ATC WOULD NOT GIVE SUCH STEEP DSCNT PROFILES BECAUSE OF NECESSARY CARE AND ATTN NEEDED FOR SOME ENGS. FOR MY PART, I COULD HAVE GONE AROUND BUT THAT WOULD HAVE REQUIRED A MISSED APCH AND I ALREADY HAD THE RWY VISUALLY. NO DAMAGE WAS DONE, BUT I OBVIOUSLY WAS NOT IN SPD AND DISTANCE LIMITS, GIVEN THE RWY CONDITIONS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.