Narrative:

The ATR was pointed out as traffic (to the DC8) by ZBW controller and the DC8 was also pointed out to the ATR. The ATR responded to the traffic call by stating the DC8 was on TCASII. When the DC8 saw the ATR traffic from approximately 2 mi and called 'traffic in sight' to ATC, the center controller then issued a clearance (DC8) to 'climb at pilot's discretion to 17000 ft.' neither aircraft had leveled at 15000 ft, 'ATR descending and DC8 climbing.' the ATR appeared at first sighting to be on a parallel course to the DC8 so no evasive action was taken on either part. The TCASII on the ATR must have urged the ATR crew to take evasive action and by the time a close course was near both aircraft turned right to avoid a collision. I believe the clearance by ATC for both aircraft at 15000 ft and the clearance for pilot discretion to climb (DC8) to 17000 ft were confusing and ambiguous and led to this near midair or near-miss. I believe the TCASII was the saving grace on the ATR and wish TCASII was installed on DC8 freighters. This would have provided earlier detection and avoidance.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLC OF A DC8 FREIGHTER, ON DEP CLB, MADE AN EVASIVE ACTION TURN TO ASSURE SEPARATION WITH A DSNDING ATR42. ATC ISSUED A TA AND CLRED THE DC8 TO A HIGHER ALT WHICH FURTHER REDUCED THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION SEPARATION. THE ATR42 ALSO MADE AN EVASIVE ACTION TURN WHEN MEETING THE DC8 HEAD-ON.

Narrative: THE ATR WAS POINTED OUT AS TFC (TO THE DC8) BY ZBW CTLR AND THE DC8 WAS ALSO POINTED OUT TO THE ATR. THE ATR RESPONDED TO THE TFC CALL BY STATING THE DC8 WAS ON TCASII. WHEN THE DC8 SAW THE ATR TFC FROM APPROX 2 MI AND CALLED 'TFC IN SIGHT' TO ATC, THE CTR CTLR THEN ISSUED A CLRNC (DC8) TO 'CLB AT PLT'S DISCRETION TO 17000 FT.' NEITHER ACFT HAD LEVELED AT 15000 FT, 'ATR DSNDING AND DC8 CLBING.' THE ATR APPEARED AT FIRST SIGHTING TO BE ON A PARALLEL COURSE TO THE DC8 SO NO EVASIVE ACTION WAS TAKEN ON EITHER PART. THE TCASII ON THE ATR MUST HAVE URGED THE ATR CREW TO TAKE EVASIVE ACTION AND BY THE TIME A CLOSE COURSE WAS NEAR BOTH ACFT TURNED R TO AVOID A COLLISION. I BELIEVE THE CLRNC BY ATC FOR BOTH ACFT AT 15000 FT AND THE CLRNC FOR PLT DISCRETION TO CLB (DC8) TO 17000 FT WERE CONFUSING AND AMBIGUOUS AND LED TO THIS NEAR MIDAIR OR NEAR-MISS. I BELIEVE THE TCASII WAS THE SAVING GRACE ON THE ATR AND WISH TCASII WAS INSTALLED ON DC8 FREIGHTERS. THIS WOULD HAVE PROVIDED EARLIER DETECTION AND AVOIDANCE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.