Narrative:

Approach control cleared us for visual approach to runway 19 and advised us that a C210 was at 3000 ft eastbound along shoreline at our 2 O'clock position. We saw him visually and on TCASII. We descended to 2000 ft and configured the aircraft. Doing this, I noted that the C210 was still a '+' reading compared to our altitude. At flaps 15 degrees and still extending to landing position of flaps 30 degrees, we got a TA and a 'pull up' on TCASII. Seeing the C210, it was more prudent to push nose over. We were on tower frequency and cessna was still with approach (I think). Tower said he was told to maintain 3000 ft.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: NMAC BTWN A B737-300 ON A FINAL VISUAL APCH AND A C210 XING IN FRONT OF THE B737. A TA WAS ISSUED TO THE B737 AND THE FLC TOOK EVASIVE ACTION.

Narrative: APCH CTL CLRED US FOR VISUAL APCH TO RWY 19 AND ADVISED US THAT A C210 WAS AT 3000 FT EBOUND ALONG SHORELINE AT OUR 2 O'CLOCK POS. WE SAW HIM VISUALLY AND ON TCASII. WE DSNDED TO 2000 FT AND CONFIGURED THE ACFT. DOING THIS, I NOTED THAT THE C210 WAS STILL A '+' READING COMPARED TO OUR ALT. AT FLAPS 15 DEGS AND STILL EXTENDING TO LNDG POS OF FLAPS 30 DEGS, WE GOT A TA AND A 'PULL UP' ON TCASII. SEEING THE C210, IT WAS MORE PRUDENT TO PUSH NOSE OVER. WE WERE ON TWR FREQ AND CESSNA WAS STILL WITH APCH (I THINK). TWR SAID HE WAS TOLD TO MAINTAIN 3000 FT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.