Narrative:

While approaching rsw airport, approach control asked if we had the airport in sight. We acknowledged that we did and we were cleared for the visual approach to runway 6 at rsw. There were no other aircraft on our frequency at the time of our arrival and approach control never contacted us to call the tower for our landing clearance. Because of this, we continued our approach and landed without a landing clearance and taxied to the gate without clearance. There were no other aircraft in the area or on the ground, so there was not a separation conflict. While on the ground in rsw, we were told to call the tower on the phone. We spoke with the tower manager who advised us of what had just happened, and he explained the situation as such that his approach controller was at fault for not telling us to contact the tower, that he had spoken to the controller about the mistake, the matter was closed and no further action would be taken. We expressed that we should have been more alert and caught the mistake, and would do so in the future. I feel that all parties are responsible for this mistake. Due the frequency being quiet, resulted in this mistake. Our situational awareness must always be 100% to avoid this from ever happening again.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: LGT ACFT ON APCH AND LNDG, APCH CTLR FORGOT TO SWITCH FLC TO TWR AND THEY FORGOT TO SWITCH FOR LNDG CLRNC. LANDED WITHOUT CLRNC.

Narrative: WHILE APCHING RSW ARPT, APCH CTL ASKED IF WE HAD THE ARPT IN SIGHT. WE ACKNOWLEDGED THAT WE DID AND WE WERE CLRED FOR THE VISUAL APCH TO RWY 6 AT RSW. THERE WERE NO OTHER ACFT ON OUR FREQ AT THE TIME OF OUR ARR AND APCH CTL NEVER CONTACTED US TO CALL THE TWR FOR OUR LNDG CLRNC. BECAUSE OF THIS, WE CONTINUED OUR APCH AND LANDED WITHOUT A LNDG CLRNC AND TAXIED TO THE GATE WITHOUT CLRNC. THERE WERE NO OTHER ACFT IN THE AREA OR ON THE GND, SO THERE WAS NOT A SEPARATION CONFLICT. WHILE ON THE GND IN RSW, WE WERE TOLD TO CALL THE TWR ON THE PHONE. WE SPOKE WITH THE TWR MGR WHO ADVISED US OF WHAT HAD JUST HAPPENED, AND HE EXPLAINED THE SIT AS SUCH THAT HIS APCH CTLR WAS AT FAULT FOR NOT TELLING US TO CONTACT THE TWR, THAT HE HAD SPOKEN TO THE CTLR ABOUT THE MISTAKE, THE MATTER WAS CLOSED AND NO FURTHER ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN. WE EXPRESSED THAT WE SHOULD HAVE BEEN MORE ALERT AND CAUGHT THE MISTAKE, AND WOULD DO SO IN THE FUTURE. I FEEL THAT ALL PARTIES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS MISTAKE. DUE THE FREQ BEING QUIET, RESULTED IN THIS MISTAKE. OUR SITUATIONAL AWARENESS MUST ALWAYS BE 100% TO AVOID THIS FROM EVER HAPPENING AGAIN.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.