Narrative:

The automated ATIS broadcasts, with the synthesized voice, sucks. (Scientific term.) it appears FAA went with 70's technology. It sounds like same system used in military P3 simulators for gca practice. We unaffectionately called it igor. It is just as difficult to understand now as it was 18 yrs ago. Let's use current technology or return to human voice recordings.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MD88 FLC UNABLE TO UNDERSTAND COMPUTERIZED ATIS VOICE ON ARR AND ON THE GND.

Narrative: THE AUTOMATED ATIS BROADCASTS, WITH THE SYNTHESIZED VOICE, SUCKS. (SCIENTIFIC TERM.) IT APPEARS FAA WENT WITH 70'S TECHNOLOGY. IT SOUNDS LIKE SAME SYS USED IN MIL P3 SIMULATORS FOR GCA PRACTICE. WE UNAFFECTIONATELY CALLED IT IGOR. IT IS JUST AS DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND NOW AS IT WAS 18 YRS AGO. LET'S USE CURRENT TECHNOLOGY OR RETURN TO HUMAN VOICE RECORDINGS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.