Narrative:

No flight strip processed to sector until high altitude sector inputs altitude to FL280. Due to limited staffing on 'a' (assistant) position, strip was not posted to the sector until the aircraft was already descended and handed off to next sector. At this time the strip is observed, and the applications of a preferred arrival route is noted. Coordination with the receiving sector is accomplished to avoid system deviations (perhaps error!) but had the strip arrived at the sector 1 min later, this would not have happened. My impression is that this is an ongoing pitfall of preferred arrival rtes being routinely applied, often without the controller's knowledge.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: SYS DEV IS AVOIDED WHEN RPTR COORDINATES THE PREFERRED ARR RTE WITH THE RECEIVING SECTOR CTLR AFTER VIEWING THE LATE STRIP POSTING TO RPTR'S SECTOR DUE TO LIMITING STAFFING.

Narrative: NO FLT STRIP PROCESSED TO SECTOR UNTIL HIGH ALT SECTOR INPUTS ALT TO FL280. DUE TO LIMITED STAFFING ON 'A' (ASSISTANT) POS, STRIP WAS NOT POSTED TO THE SECTOR UNTIL THE ACFT WAS ALREADY DSNDED AND HANDED OFF TO NEXT SECTOR. AT THIS TIME THE STRIP IS OBSERVED, AND THE APPLICATIONS OF A PREFERRED ARR RTE IS NOTED. COORD WITH THE RECEIVING SECTOR IS ACCOMPLISHED TO AVOID SYS DEVS (PERHAPS ERROR!) BUT HAD THE STRIP ARRIVED AT THE SECTOR 1 MIN LATER, THIS WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED. MY IMPRESSION IS THAT THIS IS AN ONGOING PITFALL OF PREFERRED ARR RTES BEING ROUTINELY APPLIED, OFTEN WITHOUT THE CTLR'S KNOWLEDGE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.