Narrative:

Pilots were flying jammn arrival. I was calling company on communication #2. When I got back, they said ATC told them they may have descended too early. We looked on chart at what they did and it appears they flew arrival properly. This arrival is bad and unsafe. It's hard to read and has too many stepdowns. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter states that so's are not issued the approach plates, only 'see them looking over the pilot's shoulders.' reporter said that a pilot has been threatened with a far violation for leaving an altitude too soon. Reporter is unaware that a revision is in the works. He thought that the page was 'too busy' and that separating the north and south lndgs would simplify the pilot's problems.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ANOTHER ACR CREW HAD A PROB WITH THE JAMMN 1 ARR INTO SLC.

Narrative: PLTS WERE FLYING JAMMN ARR. I WAS CALLING COMPANY ON COM #2. WHEN I GOT BACK, THEY SAID ATC TOLD THEM THEY MAY HAVE DSNDED TOO EARLY. WE LOOKED ON CHART AT WHAT THEY DID AND IT APPEARS THEY FLEW ARR PROPERLY. THIS ARR IS BAD AND UNSAFE. IT'S HARD TO READ AND HAS TOO MANY STEPDOWNS. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR STATES THAT SO'S ARE NOT ISSUED THE APCH PLATES, ONLY 'SEE THEM LOOKING OVER THE PLT'S SHOULDERS.' RPTR SAID THAT A PLT HAS BEEN THREATENED WITH A FAR VIOLATION FOR LEAVING AN ALT TOO SOON. RPTR IS UNAWARE THAT A REVISION IS IN THE WORKS. HE THOUGHT THAT THE PAGE WAS 'TOO BUSY' AND THAT SEPARATING THE N AND S LNDGS WOULD SIMPLIFY THE PLT'S PROBS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.