![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 277745 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199407 |
| Day | Fri |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : fat |
| State Reference | CA |
| Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
| Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
| Flight Phase | ground : preflight |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air taxi |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : atp |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 5000 flight time type : 550 |
| ASRS Report | 277745 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air taxi |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | non adherence : far other anomaly other |
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
| Consequence | Other |
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | Weather |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
On a scheduled flight from fresno to los angeles, I accepted a dispatch release without an alternate listed. The forecast WX for los angeles was okay for no alternate. I accidentally misread the current WX in los angeles. It alone required an alternate. The error was discovered in-flight and the flight was completed without incident in los angeles. A visual approach was performed. I was in error in misreading the current WX. I believe I was influenced in this error by the dispatch release which also listed no alternate required. Flight control for our company has taken to issuing multiple releases with up to 3 consecutive flts on them. The WX for the 3RD flight can be different at the time of the flight then it was when the release was issued. As a new captain I need to be aware of this when I receive multiple releases.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CAPT OF AN LTT ATX FAILED TO FILE AN ALTERNATE ARPT FOR AN IFR FLT PLAN.
Narrative: ON A SCHEDULED FLT FROM FRESNO TO LOS ANGELES, I ACCEPTED A DISPATCH RELEASE WITHOUT AN ALTERNATE LISTED. THE FORECAST WX FOR LOS ANGELES WAS OKAY FOR NO ALTERNATE. I ACCIDENTALLY MISREAD THE CURRENT WX IN LOS ANGELES. IT ALONE REQUIRED AN ALTERNATE. THE ERROR WAS DISCOVERED INFLT AND THE FLT WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT INCIDENT IN LOS ANGELES. A VISUAL APCH WAS PERFORMED. I WAS IN ERROR IN MISREADING THE CURRENT WX. I BELIEVE I WAS INFLUENCED IN THIS ERROR BY THE DISPATCH RELEASE WHICH ALSO LISTED NO ALTERNATE REQUIRED. FLT CTL FOR OUR COMPANY HAS TAKEN TO ISSUING MULTIPLE RELEASES WITH UP TO 3 CONSECUTIVE FLTS ON THEM. THE WX FOR THE 3RD FLT CAN BE DIFFERENT AT THE TIME OF THE FLT THEN IT WAS WHEN THE RELEASE WAS ISSUED. AS A NEW CAPT I NEED TO BE AWARE OF THIS WHEN I RECEIVE MULTIPLE RELEASES.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.