Narrative:

Cleared for visual approach runway 5 ZZZ at night. We received traffic information from ATC. 'A helicopter at 2 O'clock has you in sight, landing at hospital near approach course.' we never did see the traffic but we did get a TCASII RA to climb. We did climb, but were able to continue approach after clear of traffic from TCASII. After landing my first officer questioned tower about traffic being so close and informed him we had a TCASII RA. Both ATC and the first officer had a short but heated argument. My first officer was out of line for his tone of voice, but also ATC took offense to TCASII and it's use in the air traffic system. I have been finding that ATC in general is not too fond of TCASII because it takes away from their authority. In this case everything worked as it should.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR MLG WAS ON NIGHT VISUAL APCH. THE TWR INFORMED MLG OF AN EMS APCHING A NEARBY HOSPITAL. TCASII ALERT DEMANDED A CLB. THE MLG CLBED, THEN SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE APCH.

Narrative: CLRED FOR VISUAL APCH RWY 5 ZZZ AT NIGHT. WE RECEIVED TFC INFO FROM ATC. 'A HELI AT 2 O'CLOCK HAS YOU IN SIGHT, LNDG AT HOSPITAL NEAR APCH COURSE.' WE NEVER DID SEE THE TFC BUT WE DID GET A TCASII RA TO CLB. WE DID CLB, BUT WERE ABLE TO CONTINUE APCH AFTER CLR OF TFC FROM TCASII. AFTER LNDG MY FO QUESTIONED TWR ABOUT TFC BEING SO CLOSE AND INFORMED HIM WE HAD A TCASII RA. BOTH ATC AND THE FO HAD A SHORT BUT HEATED ARGUMENT. MY FO WAS OUT OF LINE FOR HIS TONE OF VOICE, BUT ALSO ATC TOOK OFFENSE TO TCASII AND IT'S USE IN THE AIR TFC SYS. I HAVE BEEN FINDING THAT ATC IN GENERAL IS NOT TOO FOND OF TCASII BECAUSE IT TAKES AWAY FROM THEIR AUTHORITY. IN THIS CASE EVERYTHING WORKED AS IT SHOULD.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.