Narrative:

We were cleared to 10000 contact ord approach inbound for vectors landing runway 4R, I was flying and my first officer talking. Approach cleared us to 8000 ft, my first officer read back and approach emphatically replied 4000 ft! Which my first officer dutifully read back and set in the altitude select window. He then asked for a repeat and was told 4000 ft again. I guess between 6500 and 6000 approach asked what altitude we were passing and 'what are you doing there, you're supposed to be 8000 ft?' by the time all was confirmed we bottomed out at 5500 before climbing back to 8000 ft. It was a little unnerving -- since there was a heavy load of inbound traffic and a lot of chatter. We elected not to argue the point -- a followup call to the TRACON supervisor was made. He said there was 'no problem' (with an altitude violation) and the controller got a little 'mixed up' and there had been 'no conflicting traffic.' thank god! The thought turns my stomach! We were all lucky this time. TRACON at ord regularly issues 5-6 instructions at once in a single burst -- with no time for anyone to break in between. I do not envy those controllers their jobs. Wouldn't you say that at times the volume at ord exceeds ATC capability for safe operations? I often wonder about it.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR ON DSCNT CLRED TO 8000 FT. ON READBACK TOLD 4000 FT. PASSING 6000 FT TOLD CLRNC WAS TO 8000 FT.

Narrative: WE WERE CLRED TO 10000 CONTACT ORD APCH INBOUND FOR VECTORS LNDG RWY 4R, I WAS FLYING AND MY FO TALKING. APCH CLRED US TO 8000 FT, MY FO READ BACK AND APCH EMPHATICALLY REPLIED 4000 FT! WHICH MY FO DUTIFULLY READ BACK AND SET IN THE ALT SELECT WINDOW. HE THEN ASKED FOR A REPEAT AND WAS TOLD 4000 FT AGAIN. I GUESS BTWN 6500 AND 6000 APCH ASKED WHAT ALT WE WERE PASSING AND 'WHAT ARE YOU DOING THERE, YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BE 8000 FT?' BY THE TIME ALL WAS CONFIRMED WE BOTTOMED OUT AT 5500 BEFORE CLBING BACK TO 8000 FT. IT WAS A LITTLE UNNERVING -- SINCE THERE WAS A HVY LOAD OF INBOUND TFC AND A LOT OF CHATTER. WE ELECTED NOT TO ARGUE THE POINT -- A FOLLOWUP CALL TO THE TRACON SUPVR WAS MADE. HE SAID THERE WAS 'NO PROBLEM' (WITH AN ALT VIOLATION) AND THE CTLR GOT A LITTLE 'MIXED UP' AND THERE HAD BEEN 'NO CONFLICTING TFC.' THANK GOD! THE THOUGHT TURNS MY STOMACH! WE WERE ALL LUCKY THIS TIME. TRACON AT ORD REGULARLY ISSUES 5-6 INSTRUCTIONS AT ONCE IN A SINGLE BURST -- WITH NO TIME FOR ANYONE TO BREAK IN BTWN. I DO NOT ENVY THOSE CTLRS THEIR JOBS. WOULDN'T YOU SAY THAT AT TIMES THE VOLUME AT ORD EXCEEDS ATC CAPABILITY FOR SAFE OPS? I OFTEN WONDER ABOUT IT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.