Narrative:

I was on left downwind for 21 behind another aircraft. When I was abeam the approach end of 21 the aircraft I was following was still continuing downwind (approximately 2-3 mi ahead). I radioed that I would make a right 270 degree and land on runway 30. After calling that I would be no factor for traffic on downwind for 21 I called final 30 and landed. On rollout I saw another aircraft land on 21. I locked the brakes and swerved to the right, passing behind the aircraft in the runway intersection. My mistake was not seeing the aircraft until after I was on the ground (limiting my options). Although it isn't required, I believe the other aircraft contributed to the situation by not having a radio. Additionally, the other aircraft did not seem to see me until after he landed even though I landed first.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: JUMP PLANE PLT HAS GND CONFLICT WITH ANOTHER LNDG ACFT.

Narrative: I WAS ON L DOWNWIND FOR 21 BEHIND ANOTHER ACFT. WHEN I WAS ABEAM THE APCH END OF 21 THE ACFT I WAS FOLLOWING WAS STILL CONTINUING DOWNWIND (APPROX 2-3 MI AHEAD). I RADIOED THAT I WOULD MAKE A R 270 DEG AND LAND ON RWY 30. AFTER CALLING THAT I WOULD BE NO FACTOR FOR TFC ON DOWNWIND FOR 21 I CALLED FINAL 30 AND LANDED. ON ROLLOUT I SAW ANOTHER ACFT LAND ON 21. I LOCKED THE BRAKES AND SWERVED TO THE R, PASSING BEHIND THE ACFT IN THE RWY INTXN. MY MISTAKE WAS NOT SEEING THE ACFT UNTIL AFTER I WAS ON THE GND (LIMITING MY OPTIONS). ALTHOUGH IT ISN'T REQUIRED, I BELIEVE THE OTHER ACFT CONTRIBUTED TO THE SITUATION BY NOT HAVING A RADIO. ADDITIONALLY, THE OTHER ACFT DID NOT SEEM TO SEE ME UNTIL AFTER HE LANDED EVEN THOUGH I LANDED FIRST.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.