 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Maintenance controller reported that maintenance personnel did not comply with a cdl follow up procedure on an A321.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1437320 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201704 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Environment | |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | A321 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Parked |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Flap Fairing |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Technician |
| Qualification | Maintenance Airframe Maintenance Powerplant |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural MEL Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural Maintenance |
Narrative:
Cdl procedure requires right-hand #4 flap track fairing has proper lubrication and re-lubricate as required. Maintenance supervisor was notified at xa:00 by maintenance control to have an amt accomplish this task. The task of re-inspection of flap track lubrication was not accomplished. Captain did not notice in his aml (aircraft maintenance logbook) review that the cdl follow-up procedure was not complied with and did not notify dispatch of the noncompliance. I had this follow up tracker turned over to me at shift change I noticed the departure station did not call or enter the item into the database. The aircraft was in flight by the time I noticed. I called maintenance [at the arrival airport] to accomplish the procedure accomplished for the next flight. I also had maintenance check the aml to see if the departure station did an aml entry which they did not. Maintenance did not comply with cdl follow up procedures. Flight crew did not review aml prior to departure. Suggest flight crews review the aml prior to departure they are the last link in the chain before flight.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Maintenance Controller reported that maintenance personnel did not comply with a CDL follow up procedure on an A321.
Narrative: CDL procedure requires right-hand #4 flap track fairing has proper lubrication and re-lubricate as required. Maintenance Supervisor was notified at XA:00 by Maintenance Control to have an AMT accomplish this task. The task of re-inspection of flap track lubrication was not accomplished. Captain did not notice in his AML (Aircraft Maintenance Logbook) review that the CDL follow-up procedure was not complied with and did not notify Dispatch of the noncompliance. I had this follow up tracker turned over to me at shift change I noticed the departure station did not call or enter the item into the database. The aircraft was in flight by the time I noticed. I called Maintenance [at the arrival airport] to accomplish the procedure accomplished for the next flight. I also had Maintenance check the AML to see if the departure station did an AML entry which they did not. Maintenance did not comply with CDL follow up procedures. Flight crew did not review AML prior to departure. Suggest flight crews review the AML prior to departure they are the last link in the chain before flight.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.