![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 136661 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199002 |
| Day | Sun |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : aiy |
| State Reference | NJ |
| Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Night |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | artcc : zjx |
| Operator | general aviation : personal |
| Make Model Name | Small Aircraft |
| Flight Phase | landing other |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | Other |
| Function | flight crew : single pilot |
| Qualification | pilot : private pilot : instrument |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 52 flight time total : 2500 flight time type : 46 |
| ASRS Report | 136661 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | government : faa |
| Function | controller : approach |
| Qualification | controller : radar |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure |
| Independent Detector | other other : unspecified |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
| Consequence | Other |
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
The problem arose when I changed from category a to category B aircraft and relied on previous experience and observation of 2- and 4-ENGINED turbine aircraft using the facility. The problem was discovered, after landing, when the FBO informed me that certain category B aircraft were prohibited. (The same person said nothing of this while I was in the pattern and communicating with him.) contributing factors were: 1) failure to study the airport diagram for unusual notes. 2) more than 100 previous operations at this facility in a category a aircraft. 3) observation of 2- and 4-ENGINED turbine aircraft operating at the facility. 4) category a and B IFR operations information on the approach plates. 5) no similar information in commercial airport directory. 6) no query from ATC or FBO prior to landing. Corrective actions: thorough study of airport diagrams for unusual features. Request assistance from approach controllers in questionable situations. I feel that in situations such as this, ATC, although not primarily responsible, should be informed and assist in preventing similar incidents if it is a safety problem.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: SMA TWIN CLASSIFIED CATEGORY B LANDS AT ARPT CLOSED FOR THAT CATEGORY.
Narrative: THE PROBLEM AROSE WHEN I CHANGED FROM CATEGORY A TO CATEGORY B ACFT AND RELIED ON PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE AND OBSERVATION OF 2- AND 4-ENGINED TURBINE ACFT USING THE FACILITY. THE PROBLEM WAS DISCOVERED, AFTER LNDG, WHEN THE FBO INFORMED ME THAT CERTAIN CATEGORY B ACFT WERE PROHIBITED. (THE SAME PERSON SAID NOTHING OF THIS WHILE I WAS IN THE PATTERN AND COMMUNICATING WITH HIM.) CONTRIBUTING FACTORS WERE: 1) FAILURE TO STUDY THE ARPT DIAGRAM FOR UNUSUAL NOTES. 2) MORE THAN 100 PREVIOUS OPERATIONS AT THIS FACILITY IN A CATEGORY A ACFT. 3) OBSERVATION OF 2- AND 4-ENGINED TURBINE ACFT OPERATING AT THE FACILITY. 4) CATEGORY A AND B IFR OPERATIONS INFO ON THE APCH PLATES. 5) NO SIMILAR INFO IN COMMERCIAL ARPT DIRECTORY. 6) NO QUERY FROM ATC OR FBO PRIOR TO LNDG. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: THOROUGH STUDY OF ARPT DIAGRAMS FOR UNUSUAL FEATURES. REQUEST ASSISTANCE FROM APCH CTLRS IN QUESTIONABLE SITUATIONS. I FEEL THAT IN SITUATIONS SUCH AS THIS, ATC, ALTHOUGH NOT PRIMARILY RESPONSIBLE, SHOULD BE INFORMED AND ASSIST IN PREVENTING SIMILAR INCIDENTS IF IT IS A SAFETY PROBLEM.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.