Narrative:

Our departure controller was expecting us to be flying a departure procedure other than the one issued. We were filed the prado 2 departure, using runway 8R. But clearance delivery issued 'after takeoff, right turn heading 110 degree, radar vectors daggett (dag), direct needles (eed), J-6 drake (drk), as filed. We had established the 110 degree heading on first contact with departure control (119.65), who asked us to verify we were on the prado 2 departure procedure, which would have had us on about a 175 degree course direct to the paradise (pdz) VOR. The controller adjusted to our response quickly, and it didn't appear to cause a problem, but the system's 'failure to communicate' could have presented a hazard to safe flight.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MLG FLT CREW RECEIVED CLRNC FOR RIGHT TURN AFTER TKOF WITH VECTORS TO VOR. CTLR EXPECTED THEM TO FLY SID.

Narrative: OUR DEP CTLR WAS EXPECTING US TO BE FLYING A DEP PROC OTHER THAN THE ONE ISSUED. WE WERE FILED THE PRADO 2 DEP, USING RWY 8R. BUT CLRNC DELIVERY ISSUED 'AFTER TKOF, RIGHT TURN HDG 110 DEG, RADAR VECTORS DAGGETT (DAG), DIRECT NEEDLES (EED), J-6 DRAKE (DRK), AS FILED. WE HAD ESTABLISHED THE 110 DEG HDG ON FIRST CONTACT WITH DEP CTL (119.65), WHO ASKED US TO VERIFY WE WERE ON THE PRADO 2 DEP PROC, WHICH WOULD HAVE HAD US ON ABOUT A 175 DEG COURSE DIRECT TO THE PARADISE (PDZ) VOR. THE CTLR ADJUSTED TO OUR RESPONSE QUICKLY, AND IT DIDN'T APPEAR TO CAUSE A PROBLEM, BUT THE SYSTEM'S 'FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE' COULD HAVE PRESENTED A HAZARD TO SAFE FLT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.