Narrative:

Current air carrier scheduling practices allow for trip sequences (pairings) to be constructed that may not be consistent with the fatigue risk mitigation plan (frmp). A demanding pairing was competed. Fatigue was declared for a subsequent pairing. Through the generation of required air carrier internal reports for that declaration; I became aware of an inconsistency between the flight time/duty time regulations governing this pairing and our newly implemented fatigue risk mitigation plan (frmp). This inconsistency has been reported to the airline; the federal aviation administration; and the department of transportation.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: An A320 Captain refused a trip because after flying a trip the subsequent trip was not constructed in accordance with the FAA Fatigue Risk Mitigation Plan (FRMP).

Narrative: Current air carrier scheduling practices allow for trip sequences (pairings) to be constructed that may not be consistent with the Fatigue Risk Mitigation Plan (FRMP). A demanding pairing was competed. Fatigue was declared for a subsequent pairing. Through the generation of required air carrier internal reports for that declaration; I became aware of an inconsistency between the flight time/duty time regulations governing this pairing and our newly implemented Fatigue Risk Mitigation Plan (FRMP). This inconsistency has been reported to the airline; the Federal Aviation Administration; and the department of transportation.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.