![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 918197 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201011 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | DFW.Airport |
| State Reference | TX |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 145 ER&LR |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Cruise |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Instructor Approach |
| Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Altitude Excursion From Assigned Altitude Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Conducting training on the position. Developmental assigned the E145 descent to 9;000. Several scans later I observed the E145 indicating mode C of 10;900 then 10;800. I issued an immediate climb to 110 to the E145. Crossing traffic was less than 3 miles away being worked by DR3; indicated 9;900. The wrong aircraft may have accepted the descent. I am not even sure that this aircraft was descending; but I cannot be certain that I heard the read back from the correct aircraft. I am quite certain that the developmental issued the descent to the correct aircraft. I am not sure that the correct aircraft acknowledged. The wrong aircraft may have started an early descent. The two aircraft shared similar digits and I should have been more focused on the acknowledgment. It was quite slow and I let myself get distracted by the low volume and complexity.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: D10 Controller providing OJT experienced a loss of separation event when an aircraft accepted the wrong altitude assignment; both the instructor and student controller apparently missed the read back.
Narrative: Conducting training on the position. Developmental assigned the E145 descent to 9;000. Several scans later I observed the E145 indicating Mode C of 10;900 then 10;800. I issued an immediate climb to 110 to the E145. Crossing traffic was less than 3 miles away being worked by DR3; indicated 9;900. The wrong aircraft may have accepted the descent. I am not even sure that this aircraft was descending; but I cannot be certain that I heard the read back from the correct aircraft. I am quite certain that the Developmental issued the descent to the correct aircraft. I am not sure that the correct aircraft acknowledged. The wrong aircraft may have started an early descent. The two aircraft shared similar digits and I should have been more focused on the acknowledgment. It was quite slow and I let myself get distracted by the low volume and complexity.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.