The pilot of a general aviation aircraft voiced concern regarding the communications used by miv FSS...

Attributes
ACN	904642
Time
Date	201008
Local Time Of Day	1201-1800
Place
Locale Reference	MIV.Airport
State Reference	NJ
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Make Model Name	Sundowner 23
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	Initial Approach
Flight Plan	None
Person 1
Function	Instructor Pilot Not Flying
Qualification	Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Flight Instructor
Experience	Flight Crew Last 90 Days 35 Flight Crew Total 750 Flight Crew Type 200
Events
Anomaly	ATC Issue All Types
Miss Distance	Horizontal 2000 Vertical 100

Narrative:

If someone does not review miv communication; phraseology; procedures used; scope; duties; etc. There will be aircraft collision in vicinity or at this airport. Simply put; FSS radio operators are entirely to verbose often communicating outdated; non-relevant; and inaccurate information to pilots. This behavior results in the frequency 'jammed' by FSS and prevents pilots from performing self self-announce duties adequately. I believe radio communications procedures as listed in the aim section 4-1-9 are not being followed. On two recent but separate flights; I had near misses with traffic in the vicinity. I believe these two occasions would be much less of an issue if the same situation presented at an airport without FSS; just CTAF. Although my experience is relatively limited at other non-towered airports with a operating FSS; I did not find those radio procedure as intrusive to my self-announce duties.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: The pilot of a general aviation aircraft voiced concern regarding the communications used by MIV FSS personnel indicating FSS operators are too verbose communicating outdated/inaccurate information; preventing pilots from self announcing duties.

Narrative: If someone does not review MIV communication; phraseology; procedures used; scope; duties; etc. there will be aircraft collision in vicinity or at this airport. Simply put; FSS radio operators are entirely to verbose often communicating outdated; non-relevant; and inaccurate information to pilots. This behavior results in the frequency 'jammed' by FSS and prevents pilots from performing self self-announce duties adequately. I believe radio communications procedures as listed in the AIM Section 4-1-9 are not being followed. On two recent but separate flights; I had near misses with traffic in the vicinity. I believe these two occasions would be much less of an issue if the same situation presented at an airport without FSS; just CTAF. Although my experience is relatively limited at other non-towered airports with a operating FSS; I did not find those radio procedure as intrusive to my self-announce duties.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

The pilot of a general aviation aircraft voiced concern regarding the communications used by miv FSS personnel indicating FSS operators are too verbose communicating outdated/inaccurate information; preventing pilots from self announcing duties.