![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 862909 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200912 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | RNO.Airport |
| State Reference | NV |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | A320 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Climb |
| Route In Use | Vectors |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Descent |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Flight Data / Clearance Delivery Departure Approach Supervisor / CIC |
| Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 130 Flight Crew Total 12000 Flight Crew Type 130 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Conflict Airborne Conflict |
Narrative:
Air carrier X departed rno IFR; was turned left direct llc; leveled at 120. Air carrier Y inbound to rno; IFR; level at 130. Air carrier X was issued as traffic to air carrier Y. Air carrier Y reported air carrier X in sight. Air carrier Y was issued as traffic to air carrier X. Air carrier X reported air carrier Y in sight. Air carrier X was instructed to maintain visual separation with the traffic; pilot's discretion; climb and maintain FL190. Air carrier X acknowledged the instructions and started his climb. Air carrier Y was told that air carrier X was maintaining visual separation and continuing his climb. Air carrier Y acknowledged. Air carrier Y then advised that he was responding to an RA and climbing. Air carrier X keyed up and told air carrier Y that he was sorry for causing his RA. I later learned that air carrier X also responded to an RA. Air carrier X continued to his destination and air carrier Y landed at rno. Recommendation; I feel that I followed the rules of the book to the letter. I thought that air carrier X would use better judgment and wait until he was past air carrier Y to start his climb. In the future; I will use more diligence to ensure that this does not happen again. In the future; I will just wait until the aircraft have passed; then continue their descent and/or climb.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A RNO Controller described a TCAS RA event involving two air carrier aircraft maintaining visual separation with each other. The Controller claimed appropriate procedures were utilized.
Narrative: Air Carrier X departed RNO IFR; was turned left direct LLC; leveled at 120. Air Carrier Y inbound to RNO; IFR; level at 130. Air Carrier X was issued as traffic to Air Carrier Y. Air Carrier Y reported Air Carrier X in sight. Air Carrier Y was issued as traffic to Air Carrier X. Air Carrier X reported Air Carrier Y in sight. Air Carrier X was instructed to maintain visual separation with the traffic; pilot's discretion; climb and maintain FL190. Air Carrier X acknowledged the instructions and started his climb. Air Carrier Y was told that Air Carrier X was maintaining visual separation and continuing his climb. Air Carrier Y acknowledged. Air Carrier Y then advised that he was responding to an RA and climbing. Air Carrier X keyed up and told Air Carrier Y that he was sorry for causing his RA. I later learned that Air Carrier X also responded to an RA. Air Carrier X continued to his destination and Air Carrier Y landed at RNO. Recommendation; I feel that I followed the rules of the book to the letter. I thought that Air Carrier X would use better judgment and wait until he was past Air Carrier Y to start his climb. In the future; I will use more diligence to ensure that this does not happen again. In the future; I will just wait until the aircraft have passed; then continue their descent and/or climb.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.