Narrative:

Pilot in command experienced heavy turbulence and LLWS at xsa; as well as enroute back to flight point of origin at 2w6. Pilot in command called FSS at the conclusion of the flight to submit a PIREP to advise other GA aircraft in the vicinity of potentially hazardous turbulence. The first PIREP submitted was submitted as a uua PIREP; describing heavy turbulence and possible LLWS during final approach and landing at xsa. The second PIREP was a ua code; concerning moderate to severe turbulence at about the pxt 240 degree radial at 15 NM at 3;000 ft MSL. The pilot in command has a habit of verifying if the PIREP was entered correctly by means of using both adds and duat. Upon checking both sites; all that was seen (a query for PIREPS submitted over the last 6 hours was used) was a ua PIREP at the pxt 240 degree radial at 5 NM; a P28R reporting light chop. The uua PIREP submitted for the hazardous conditions at xsa was not entered by the FSS representative. This; in the opinion of the pilot in command; represents a potential safety of flight hazard. It is the opinion of the pilot in command that there should be a mechanism for reporting PIREPS outside of ATC and FSS. It would be prudent that a website be created or a mechanism within duat/duats be created to allow pilots to submit PIREPS electronically. This would encourage more pilot weather reporting and contribute to increased flight safety.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: General aviation pilot described turbulence event; reported PIREP specifics to FSS; follow up check on PIREP information indicated incorrect FAA data issued; reporter suggesting alternate means of PIREP input.

Narrative: Pilot in Command experienced heavy turbulence and LLWS at XSA; as well as enroute back to flight point of origin at 2W6. Pilot in Command called FSS at the conclusion of the flight to submit a PIREP to advise other GA aircraft in the vicinity of potentially hazardous turbulence. The first PIREP submitted was submitted as a UUA PIREP; describing heavy turbulence and possible LLWS during final approach and landing at XSA. The second PIREP was a UA code; concerning moderate to severe turbulence at about the PXT 240 degree radial at 15 NM at 3;000 FT MSL. The Pilot in Command has a habit of verifying if the PIREP was entered correctly by means of using both ADDS and DUAT. Upon checking both sites; all that was seen (a query for PIREPS submitted over the last 6 hours was used) was a UA PIREP at the PXT 240 degree radial at 5 NM; a P28R reporting light chop. The UUA PIREP submitted for the hazardous conditions at XSA was not entered by the FSS representative. This; in the opinion of the Pilot in Command; represents a potential safety of flight hazard. It is the opinion of the Pilot in Command that there should be a mechanism for reporting PIREPS outside of ATC and FSS. It would be prudent that a website be created or a mechanism within DUAT/DUATS be created to allow pilots to submit PIREPS electronically. This would encourage more pilot weather reporting and contribute to increased flight safety.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.