Narrative:

With an large transport B on our left for runway 26L at den, stapleton, we were flying a visual approach to runway 26R. An small transport C (commuter service) aircraft was on a visual approach to runway 25. Upon passing the OM, the large transport B was parallel to us and the small transport C was behind to our right. The small transport passed us on the right at approximately 1500' AGL with 300-500' horizontal spacing. The distraction caused a 10 KT loss of airspeed to vref. The situation of 3 aircraft all nearly parallel for approach to their respective runways leaves the middle aircraft vulnerable and with few options. Staggered arrs would dramatically improve the safety of such an operation (3 parallel runways). Maintaining spacing once on final approach (no passing) would also help.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR SMT PASSED MLG AND LGT ON TRIPLE CLOSE SPACED PARALLEL APCHES.

Narrative: WITH AN LGT B ON OUR LEFT FOR RWY 26L AT DEN, STAPLETON, WE WERE FLYING A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 26R. AN SMT C (COMMUTER SVC) ACFT WAS ON A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 25. UPON PASSING THE OM, THE LGT B WAS PARALLEL TO US AND THE SMT C WAS BEHIND TO OUR RIGHT. THE SMT PASSED US ON THE RIGHT AT APPROX 1500' AGL WITH 300-500' HORIZ SPACING. THE DISTR CAUSED A 10 KT LOSS OF AIRSPD TO VREF. THE SITUATION OF 3 ACFT ALL NEARLY PARALLEL FOR APCH TO THEIR RESPECTIVE RWYS LEAVES THE MIDDLE ACFT VULNERABLE AND WITH FEW OPTIONS. STAGGERED ARRS WOULD DRAMATICALLY IMPROVE THE SAFETY OF SUCH AN OPERATION (3 PARALLEL RWYS). MAINTAINING SPACING ONCE ON FINAL APCH (NO PASSING) WOULD ALSO HELP.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.