|37000 Feet||Browse and search NASA's
Aviation Safety Reporting System
|Local Time Of Day||1201 To 1800|
|Locale Reference||airport : unk|
|Altitude||agl bound lower : 0|
agl bound upper : 0
|Operator||common carrier : air taxi|
|Make Model Name||Small Transport, Low Wing, 2 Recip Eng|
|Flight Phase||ground : preflight|
|Affiliation||company : air taxi|
|Function||flight crew : single pilot|
|Qualification||pilot : commercial|
pilot : instrument
|Function||observation : air carrier inspector|
|Anomaly||non adherence : far|
|Independent Detector||other flight crewa|
other other : unspecified
|Resolutory Action||none taken : anomaly accepted|
|Consequence||faa : investigated|
|Primary Problem||Flight Crew Human Performance|
|Air Traffic Incident||Pilot Deviation|
Upon arrival at nome I was confronted by an FAA maintenance inspector. He had been notified by an FAA inspector in unalakleet that there were a few discrepancies on my aircraft. When I did the preflight I had noticed some discrepancies but since I was going VFR part 91 and the plane was going up for maintenance and none of the discrepancies were affecting airworthiness I made the flight. The outcome was they accused me of a possible violation of at far.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PLT OF ATX SMT ACCUSED OF POSSIBLE FEDERAL AVIATION REG VIOLATION.
Narrative: UPON ARR AT NOME I WAS CONFRONTED BY AN FAA MAINT INSPECTOR. HE HAD BEEN NOTIFIED BY AN FAA INSPECTOR IN UNALAKLEET THAT THERE WERE A FEW DISCREPANCIES ON MY ACFT. WHEN I DID THE PREFLT I HAD NOTICED SOME DISCREPANCIES BUT SINCE I WAS GOING VFR PART 91 AND THE PLANE WAS GOING UP FOR MAINT AND NONE OF THE DISCREPANCIES WERE AFFECTING AIRWORTHINESS I MADE THE FLT. THE OUTCOME WAS THEY ACCUSED ME OF A POSSIBLE VIOLATION OF AT FAR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.