Narrative:

My aircraft is equipped with an electrically adjustable constant speed propeller manufactured by mt; and a subaru 2.5L automatic conversion engine. The engine drives a 2:1 speed reduction unit to achieve maximum power without exceeding the propeller redline of 2700 RPM; which means normal engine redline is about 5400 RPM. After a normal pre-flight and engine run up; which includes verifying propeller control; I received clearance to taxi to the runway. The intent of the flight was to practice touch and go landings. I called the tower for clearance to remain in closed traffic for touch and go's. I eventually received a takeoff clearance with instructions to maintain upwind 'to the river bed' to avoid inbound traffic. I also knew the next aircraft in line for takeoff was a lear jet and that there was other traffic in the pattern. There was quite a lot of normal radio chatter between ATC and the other aircraft. I taxied onto the runway and applied full throttle with the propeller controller set to 2700 RPM; which is the procedure for normal full power takeoff. Once airborne; the propeller is able to turn faster; and normally the electronic controller increases the blade pitch to maintain 2700 RPM. The propeller hub is relatively slow to respond; so it is not unusual to quickly achieve the redline propeller RPM. I then noticed an engine alarm from my grt eis 4000 engine monitor indicating excessive RPM. I immediately turned the propeller controller to 2500 RPM and reduced power slightly to allow the propeller hub to 'catch up' with adjusting the blade pitch. As this is not an unusual situation; I didn't worry about it and continued to climb out. A few seconds later; the engine was wound up to its absolute redline of 6800 RPM; which is about 3380 propeller RPM. This is far in excess of the safe operational limit of the propeller. I immediately reduced throttle to maintain 2700 propeller RPM. Data log analysis shows that the throttle position was moved to 43% of maximum throttle to maintain 2700 RPM. The effect of this was that the aircraft was unable to climb at more than about 100 FPM on the upwind departure leg. Because of the unusually low power setting; I decided not to attempt any diagnosis of the problem; but rather to devote my attention to maintaining control of the airplane in the state it was in. While the situation was obviously serious; I knew I could make it around the pattern and land without endangering other aircraft. The airplane has an abundance of power; and even at less than 1/2 throttle I was able to easily maintain altitude and full control. However; I also wanted to make sure ATC was aware that I needed priority. So here is the exciting part. There was so much radio traffic I was unable to get a word in until well into the situation. By this time I turned onto a right crosswind leg; but well short of the river bed. I waited several seconds for a break in radio traffic. In retrospect; I should have immediately said 'emergency -- unable to make power' or something nice and simple to the point. Instead; I said something like 'pan pan pan; (callsign) has propeller controller failure. Not making much power; turned early for right traffic; will be full stop runway xx' which took too many seconds of precious time to speak while distracted with a critical situation in the cockpit. ATC took my speech to mean that I had an emergency; and began a flurry of radio calls to have the lear jet behind me abort takeoff and to redirect other traffic in the pattern. While this was happening; I started to smell the engine burning from the excessively high power run and I was suddenly highly motivated to declare the emergency and turn back to runway yy. Right at that time; ATC cleared me for runway yy and I turned direct to the numbers; more than willing to take the short approach. I was already on a right crosswind leg; so I turned right and said 'turning direct runway yy'. The learjet pilot was able to abort and exit the runway before I got to the runway and I made a relatively normal landing on runway yyand exited at taxiway. No damage was done to the propeller or engine. Inspection of the propeller hub showed excessively darkened slip rings; which may have contributed to a poor electrical connection. Conclusions: 1. Pre flight checks confirmed correct operation of the controller; but it is entirely possible that the electrical slip ring contact may have been marginal due to carbon buildup or corrosion; and the stress of full in flight power prevented correct operation. Cleaning of the brush/slip ring system will now be made at least twice per year instead of just during the aircraft annual condition inspection. 2. In hindsight; I am of the opinion that lack of practice in emergency procedures caused some mild panic. That; along with the reluctance to say the word 'emergency' caused me to fail to convey the situation to ATC in a clear and concise manner. Practicing emergency scenarios will be #1 on my list of things to do.callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter stated his vans rv-9A uses a subaru 2.5 liter; 165 hp rated; water cooled engine and a three-bladed propeller with wood core composite blades and a nickel plate on the leading edges. The electrically adjustable constant speed propeller and the propeller controller are manufactured by mt of germany. The controller; which includes the selector for 'automatic' or 'manual' is mounted in the instrument panel. Reporter stated he has never run into a problem where the propeller failed to respond during takeoff. Some years ago mt offered a modification for their propeller controllers due to pilots reporting; when in a 'fine' pitch dive; the propeller would get stuck and not come out of low pitch. Mt provided a fix that would increase current to the slip rings. The brushes for the slip ring and the magnetic sensors for the propeller RPM are one assembly mounted to a bracket on the back of the hub. Reporter stated the darkened slip rings seem to reduce the current from the controller to the electric motor that rotates the propeller blades to change pitch. The brushes were not worn; but were the original set. He noticed the darkened color of the slip rings seems to happen sooner; even though he has not put that many hours on the aircraft recently. Reporter stated since he cleaned the slip rings using 1000 grit sandpaper and adjusted the stops; he hasn't had a similar problem. He uses a grand rapids technologies (grt) eis 4000 for engine RPM monitoring. The entire aircraft is a 12 volt electrical system. The engine shaft; propeller reduction unit and propeller are mounted in a straight line.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: DURING TAKEOFF; HOME-BUILT VANS RV-9A PILOT NOTICES THE SUBARU ENGINE RPM'S AND THE MT PROPELLER RPM'S HAD REDLINED. PILOT DECLARED EMERGENCY SHORTLY AFTER SMELLING ENGINE BURNING. NORMAL LANDING; NO PROP OR ENGINE DAMAGE.

Narrative: MY AIRCRAFT IS EQUIPPED WITH AN ELECTRICALLY ADJUSTABLE CONSTANT SPEED PROPELLER MANUFACTURED BY MT; AND A SUBARU 2.5L AUTO CONVERSION ENGINE. THE ENGINE DRIVES A 2:1 SPEED REDUCTION UNIT TO ACHIEVE MAXIMUM POWER WITHOUT EXCEEDING THE PROPELLER REDLINE OF 2700 RPM; WHICH MEANS NORMAL ENGINE REDLINE IS ABOUT 5400 RPM. AFTER A NORMAL PRE-FLIGHT AND ENGINE RUN UP; WHICH INCLUDES VERIFYING PROPELLER CONTROL; I RECEIVED CLEARANCE TO TAXI TO THE RUNWAY. THE INTENT OF THE FLIGHT WAS TO PRACTICE TOUCH AND GO LANDINGS. I CALLED THE TOWER FOR CLEARANCE TO REMAIN IN CLOSED TRAFFIC FOR TOUCH AND GO'S. I EVENTUALLY RECEIVED A TAKEOFF CLEARANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO MAINTAIN UPWIND 'TO THE RIVER BED' TO AVOID INBOUND TRAFFIC. I ALSO KNEW THE NEXT ACFT IN LINE FOR TAKEOFF WAS A LEAR JET AND THAT THERE WAS OTHER TRAFFIC IN THE PATTERN. THERE WAS QUITE A LOT OF NORMAL RADIO CHATTER BETWEEN ATC AND THE OTHER ACFT. I TAXIED ONTO THE RWY AND APPLIED FULL THROTTLE WITH THE PROP CTLR SET TO 2700 RPM; WHICH IS THE PROC FOR NORMAL FULL POWER TAKEOFF. ONCE AIRBORNE; THE PROP IS ABLE TO TURN FASTER; AND NORMALLY THE ELECTRONIC CONTROLLER INCREASES THE BLADE PITCH TO MAINTAIN 2700 RPM. THE PROP HUB IS RELATIVELY SLOW TO RESPOND; SO IT IS NOT UNUSUAL TO QUICKLY ACHIEVE THE REDLINE PROP RPM. I THEN NOTICED AN ENGINE ALARM FROM MY GRT EIS 4000 ENGINE MONITOR INDICATING EXCESSIVE RPM. I IMMEDIATELY TURNED THE PROP CONTROLLER TO 2500 RPM AND REDUCED POWER SLIGHTLY TO ALLOW THE PROP HUB TO 'CATCH UP' WITH ADJUSTING THE BLADE PITCH. AS THIS IS NOT AN UNUSUAL SITUATION; I DIDN'T WORRY ABOUT IT AND CONTINUED TO CLIMB OUT. A FEW SECONDS LATER; THE ENGINE WAS WOUND UP TO ITS ABSOLUTE REDLINE OF 6800 RPM; WHICH IS ABOUT 3380 PROP RPM. THIS IS FAR IN EXCESS OF THE SAFE OPERATIONAL LIMIT OF THE PROPELLER. I IMMEDIATELY REDUCED THROTTLE TO MAINTAIN 2700 PROP RPM. DATA LOG ANALYSIS SHOWS THAT THE THROTTLE POSITION WAS MOVED TO 43% OF MAXIMUM THROTTLE TO MAINTAIN 2700 RPM. THE EFFECT OF THIS WAS THAT THE AIRCRAFT WAS UNABLE TO CLIMB AT MORE THAN ABOUT 100 FPM ON THE UPWIND DEP LEG. BECAUSE OF THE UNUSUALLY LOW POWER SETTING; I DECIDED NOT TO ATTEMPT ANY DIAGNOSIS OF THE PROBLEM; BUT RATHER TO DEVOTE MY ATTENTION TO MAINTAINING CONTROL OF THE AIRPLANE IN THE STATE IT WAS IN. WHILE THE SITUATION WAS OBVIOUSLY SERIOUS; I KNEW I COULD MAKE IT AROUND THE PATTERN AND LAND WITHOUT ENDANGERING OTHER AIRCRAFT. THE AIRPLANE HAS AN ABUNDANCE OF POWER; AND EVEN AT LESS THAN 1/2 THROTTLE I WAS ABLE TO EASILY MAINTAIN ALTITUDE AND FULL CONTROL. HOWEVER; I ALSO WANTED TO MAKE SURE ATC WAS AWARE THAT I NEEDED PRIORITY. SO HERE IS THE EXCITING PART. THERE WAS SO MUCH RADIO TRAFFIC I WAS UNABLE TO GET A WORD IN UNTIL WELL INTO THE SITUATION. BY THIS TIME I TURNED ONTO A RIGHT CROSSWIND LEG; BUT WELL SHORT OF THE RIVER BED. I WAITED SEVERAL SECONDS FOR A BREAK IN RADIO TRAFFIC. IN RETROSPECT; I SHOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY SAID 'EMERGENCY -- UNABLE TO MAKE POWER' OR SOMETHING NICE AND SIMPLE TO THE POINT. INSTEAD; I SAID SOMETHING LIKE 'PAN PAN PAN; (CALLSIGN) HAS PROP CONTROLLER FAILURE. NOT MAKING MUCH POWER; TURNED EARLY FOR RIGHT TRAFFIC; WILL BE FULL STOP RUNWAY XX' WHICH TOOK TOO MANY SECONDS OF PRECIOUS TIME TO SPEAK WHILE DISTRACTED WITH A CRITICAL SITUATION IN THE COCKPIT. ATC TOOK MY SPEECH TO MEAN THAT I HAD AN EMERGENCY; AND BEGAN A FLURRY OF RADIO CALLS TO HAVE THE LEAR JET BEHIND ME ABORT TAKEOFF AND TO REDIRECT OTHER TRAFFIC IN THE PATTERN. WHILE THIS WAS HAPPENING; I STARTED TO SMELL THE ENGINE BURNING FROM THE EXCESSIVELY HIGH POWER RUN AND I WAS SUDDENLY HIGHLY MOTIVATED TO DECLARE THE EMERGENCY AND TURN BACK TO RUNWAY YY. RIGHT AT THAT TIME; ATC CLEARED ME FOR RUNWAY YY AND I TURNED DIRECT TO THE NUMBERS; MORE THAN WILLING TO TAKE THE SHORT APPROACH. I WAS ALREADY ON A RIGHT CROSSWIND LEG; SO I TURNED RIGHT AND SAID 'TURNING DIRECT RUNWAY YY'. THE LEARJET PILOT WAS ABLE TO ABORT AND EXIT THE RUNWAY BEFORE I GOT TO THE RUNWAY AND I MADE A RELATIVELY NORMAL LANDING ON RUNWAY YYAND EXITED AT TXWY. NO DAMAGE WAS DONE TO THE PROP OR ENGINE. INSPECTION OF THE PROP HUB SHOWED EXCESSIVELY DARKENED SLIP RINGS; WHICH MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO A POOR ELECTRICAL CONNECTION. CONCLUSIONS: 1. PRE FLIGHT CHECKS CONFIRMED CORRECT OPERATION OF THE CONTROLLER; BUT IT IS ENTIRELY POSSIBLE THAT THE ELECTRICAL SLIP RING CONTACT MAY HAVE BEEN MARGINAL DUE TO CARBON BUILDUP OR CORROSION; AND THE STRESS OF FULL IN FLIGHT POWER PREVENTED CORRECT OPERATION. CLEANING OF THE BRUSH/SLIP RING SYSTEM WILL NOW BE MADE AT LEAST TWICE PER YEAR INSTEAD OF JUST DURING THE AIRCRAFT ANNUAL CONDITION INSPECTION. 2. IN HINDSIGHT; I AM OF THE OPINION THAT LACK OF PRACTICE IN EMERGENCY PROCEDURES CAUSED SOME MILD PANIC. THAT; ALONG WITH THE RELUCTANCE TO SAY THE WORD 'EMERGENCY' CAUSED ME TO FAIL TO CONVEY THE SITUATION TO ATC IN A CLEAR AND CONCISE MANNER. PRACTICING EMERGENCY SCENARIOS WILL BE #1 ON MY LIST OF THINGS TO DO.CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: REPORTER STATED HIS VANS RV-9A USES A SUBARU 2.5 LITER; 165 HP RATED; WATER COOLED ENGINE AND A THREE-BLADED PROP WITH WOOD CORE COMPOSITE BLADES AND A NICKEL PLATE ON THE LEADING EDGES. THE ELECTRICALLY ADJUSTABLE CONSTANT SPEED PROP AND THE PROP CONTROLLER ARE MANUFACTURED BY MT OF GERMANY. THE CONTROLLER; WHICH INCLUDES THE SELECTOR FOR 'AUTO' OR 'MANUAL' IS MOUNTED IN THE INSTRUMENT PANEL. REPORTER STATED HE HAS NEVER RUN INTO A PROBLEM WHERE THE PROP FAILED TO RESPOND DURING TAKEOFF. SOME YEARS AGO MT OFFERED A MODIFICATION FOR THEIR PROP CONTROLLERS DUE TO PILOTS REPORTING; WHEN IN A 'FINE' PITCH DIVE; THE PROP WOULD GET STUCK AND NOT COME OUT OF LOW PITCH. MT PROVIDED A FIX THAT WOULD INCREASE CURRENT TO THE SLIP RINGS. THE BRUSHES FOR THE SLIP RING AND THE MAGNETIC SENSORS FOR THE PROP RPM ARE ONE ASSEMBLY MOUNTED TO A BRACKET ON THE BACK OF THE HUB. REPORTER STATED THE DARKENED SLIP RINGS SEEM TO REDUCE THE CURRENT FROM THE CONTROLLER TO THE ELECTRIC MOTOR THAT ROTATES THE PROP BLADES TO CHANGE PITCH. THE BRUSHES WERE NOT WORN; BUT WERE THE ORIGINAL SET. HE NOTICED THE DARKENED COLOR OF THE SLIP RINGS SEEMS TO HAPPEN SOONER; EVEN THOUGH HE HAS NOT PUT THAT MANY HOURS ON THE AIRCRAFT RECENTLY. REPORTER STATED SINCE HE CLEANED THE SLIP RINGS USING 1000 GRIT SANDPAPER AND ADJUSTED THE STOPS; HE HASN'T HAD A SIMILAR PROBLEM. HE USES A GRAND RAPIDS TECHNOLOGIES (GRT) EIS 4000 FOR ENGINE RPM MONITORING. THE ENTIRE AIRCRAFT IS A 12 VOLT ELECTRICAL SYSTEM. THE ENGINE SHAFT; PROP REDUCTION UNIT AND PROP ARE MOUNTED IN A STRAIGHT LINE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.