Narrative:

Didn't follow the runway 24 SID teb 5 departure correctly. We briefed the departure on the sic's; efb. The efb did not show the entire departure on zoom mode. We only had half the departure procedure. The departure was to 'climb runway fix to 1500 ft the right to 280 degree heading; at 4.5 DME from teb climb to 2000 ft.' we climbed runway heading to 1500 ft then did not turn at 280 degree heading and stayed on runway heading till 4.5 DME. Then before we reached the 435 DME ATC cleared us to a 310 heading and climb to 6000 ft. No other deviations were necessary. 1) problem arose from trusting the sic to read the departure correctly. 2) both pilots should have taken their own efb's out and separately look at the departure. 3) sic not paying attention to detail. 4) fatigue or distracted individuals.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A FALCON 20 CAPT RPTS A TRACK DEV ON THE TEB 5 DEP.

Narrative: DIDN'T FOLLOW THE RWY 24 SID TEB 5 DEP CORRECTLY. WE BRIEFED THE DEP ON THE SIC'S; EFB. THE EFB DID NOT SHOW THE ENTIRE DEP ON ZOOM MODE. WE ONLY HAD HALF THE DEP PROC. THE DEP WAS TO 'CLB RWY FIX TO 1500 FT THE R TO 280 DEG HDG; AT 4.5 DME FROM TEB CLB TO 2000 FT.' WE CLBED RWY HDG TO 1500 FT THEN DID NOT TURN AT 280 DEG HDG AND STAYED ON RWY HDG TILL 4.5 DME. THEN BEFORE WE REACHED THE 435 DME ATC CLRED US TO A 310 HDG AND CLB TO 6000 FT. NO OTHER DEVS WERE NECESSARY. 1) PROBLEM AROSE FROM TRUSTING THE SIC TO READ THE DEP CORRECTLY. 2) BOTH PLTS SHOULD HAVE TAKEN THEIR OWN EFB'S OUT AND SEPARATELY LOOK AT THE DEP. 3) SIC NOT PAYING ATTENTION TO DETAIL. 4) FATIGUE OR DISTRACTED INDIVIDUALS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.