Narrative:

We departed from runway 24 at teb on the teb 5 departure. During initial climb; we received a windshear warning from the GPWS. There were no other indications of windshear; so I believe that this was a false warning. However; my first officer became fixated on this warning and did not begin to level at 1500 ft MSL per the SID. I verbally challenged my first officer; but received no response. I proceeded to take control of the aircraft and level the air plane. We were able to level by 1700 ft MSL and returned to 1500 ft MSL. I feel that the primary cause of this occurrence was a cockpit distraction. A contributing issue is the complexity of the combined SID and noise abatement procedures at teb. They really should be simplified.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: HS125 FLT CREW DEPARTING ON THE TEB 5 DEPARTURE EXPERIENCE A POSSIBLY FALSE WINDSHEAR WARNING WHICH DISTRACTS THE FLYING PILOT WHO OVERSHOOTS THE INITIAL LEVEL OFF AT 1500 FEET.

Narrative: WE DEPARTED FROM RWY 24 AT TEB ON THE TEB 5 DEP. DURING INITIAL CLB; WE RECEIVED A WINDSHEAR WARNING FROM THE GPWS. THERE WERE NO OTHER INDICATIONS OF WINDSHEAR; SO I BELIEVE THAT THIS WAS A FALSE WARNING. HOWEVER; MY FO BECAME FIXATED ON THIS WARNING AND DID NOT BEGIN TO LEVEL AT 1500 FT MSL PER THE SID. I VERBALLY CHALLENGED MY FO; BUT RECEIVED NO RESPONSE. I PROCEEDED TO TAKE CTL OF THE ACFT AND LEVEL THE AIR PLANE. WE WERE ABLE TO LEVEL BY 1700 FT MSL AND RETURNED TO 1500 FT MSL. I FEEL THAT THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF THIS OCCURRENCE WAS A COCKPIT DISTRACTION. A CONTRIBUTING ISSUE IS THE COMPLEXITY OF THE COMBINED SID AND NOISE ABATEMENT PROCS AT TEB. THEY REALLY SHOULD BE SIMPLIFIED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.